The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: Which points are best for screening?

Damato, Bertil; Ahmed, J; Allan, Donald; McClure, Elizabeth; Jay, J L

doi:10.1038/eye.1989.112

Cited by 18 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In three of the four studies, including the study by Harper and colleagues, the participants were considered to be representative of a screening 154,170 or diagnostic 182 setting, while the representativeness of the participants was unclear in the case-control study by Damato and colleagues. 180 However, in contrast to the other three studies, in the study by Harper and colleagues 182 there was minimal instruction and supervision. In preparation for the test, the participants were asked to read the test instructions with no further assistance given, following which they self-administered the test, unsupervised.…”

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 94%

“…180,182 Figure 28 summarises the quality assessment for these studies. In three of the four studies the participants were considered to be representative of a screening 154,170 or diagnostic 182 setting.…”

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this study contained a higher than average prevalence of glaucoma (10.7%) and it would be expected that the sensitivity of the test would therefore be higher in such a population compared with an average prevalence population. The pooled sensitivity, specificity and DOR from the meta-analysis models for the common cut-off were 86% (95% 154 Damato, 1989 180 Harper, 1994 182 Yamada, 1999 170 …”

Section: Figure 29(a) and (B)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The earliest study took place in 1963 21 and the latest in 2003/04, 156,176 while 21 studies gave no indication of the period in which they were carried out. Thirteen studies took place in the USA, 22,158,159,162,166,168,170,172,175,181,[187][188][189] nine in the UK, 21,164,176,177,180,182,186,190,191 four in Australia, 115,157,163,173 two each in Italy, 106,174 The Netherlands, 169,183 Spain 99,179 and Sweden, 100,171 one each in Belgium, 155 Canada, 156 Greece, 112 India 161 and Norway, 154 and one in Canada and Finland. 178 Twenty-six studies gave details of the gender of their participants, 51% of whom were women.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…21,72,99,100,106,112,115,[154][155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162][163][164][165][166][167][168][169][170] Twenty studies were representative of a glaucoma suspect population referred from primary care, of which eight were cohort studies 22,171-177 and 12 were case-control studies. [178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185][186][187][188][189][190][191] …”

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Burr¹,

Mowatt²,

Hernández³

et al. 2007

Health Technol Assess

317

380

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. NHS libraries can subscribe free of charge. Public libraries can subscribe at a very reduced cost of £100 for each volume (normally comprising 30-40 titles). The commercial subscription rate is £300 per volume. Please see our website for details. Subscriptions can only be purchased for the current or forthcoming volume. Contact details are as follows: Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK. We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA NIHR Health Technology Assessment ProgrammeT he Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme, now part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 1993. It produces high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined to include all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care, rather than settings of care. The research findings from the HTA Programme directly influence decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC). HTA findings also help to improve the quality of clinical practice in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service'. The HTA Programme is needs-led in that it fills gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. There are three routes to the start of projects. First is the commissioned route. Suggestions for research are actively sought from people working in the NHS, the public and consumer groups and professional bodies such as r...

show abstract

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Figure 29(a) and (B)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Accuracymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation

Burr¹,

Mowatt²,

Hernández³

et al. 2007

Health Technol Assess

317

380

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Screening for Glaucoma With Frequency-Doubling Technology and Damato Campimetry

Yamada

Chen²,

Mills³

et al. 1999

Arch Ophthalmol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To assess frequency-doubling technology (FDT) perimetry (Humphrey Systems, San Leandro, Calif) and Damato campimetry (Precision Vision, Villa Park, Ill) for detecting glaucoma in a public glaucoma screening. Methods: A 2-day public glaucoma screening was held at 2 different institutions. Each subject underwent 2 visual field screening tests (Damato campimetry and FDT perimetry in screening mode), an ophthalmologic examination, and Humphrey perimetry (24-2 FASTPAC) for each eye. Eyes were divided into 4 categories: normal, ocular hypertensive, glaucoma suspect, and definite glaucoma. The sensitivity and specificity of FDT perimetry and Damato campimetry for detecting glaucoma were estimated with receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: Among 240 subjects who underwent FDT, the number identified as normal, ocular hypertensive, glau-coma suspect, and definite glaucoma was 151, 28, 35, and 26, respectively; among 175 subjects who underwent Damato campimetry, the numbers for the same groups were 118, 19, 19, and 19, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for FDT perimetry and Damato campimetry were 0.925 and 0.883, respectively. The optimal sensitivity and specificity for FDT perimetry were 92% and 93%, while those for Damato campimetry were 53% and 90%, respectively. The average test time was 1 minute and 3 minutes per eye for FDT perimetry and Damato campimetry, respectively. Conclusion: Frequency-doubling technology perimetry was superior to Damato campimetry in this screening for glaucoma.

show abstract