2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The detection accuracies for proximal caries by cone-beam computerized tomography, film, and phosphor plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
42
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Their results showed that CBCT images presented a slightly higher efficiency on caries detection with Azs of 0.528 for Promax 3D and 0.525 for Kodak 9000 3D, but there was no statistical difference from the other studied modalities. In this study, the protocol 4, the same used on Zhang et al 19 , showed one of the best results for proximal caries detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Their results showed that CBCT images presented a slightly higher efficiency on caries detection with Azs of 0.528 for Promax 3D and 0.525 for Kodak 9000 3D, but there was no statistical difference from the other studied modalities. In this study, the protocol 4, the same used on Zhang et al 19 , showed one of the best results for proximal caries detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The results showed a significant improvement in the detection of proximal caries by CBCT images. However, other studies compared digital intraoral radiographs and CBCT images and concluded that the use of CBCT did not increase the accuracy of proximal caries detection [19][20][21] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intra oral radiography provides us two-dimensional information that is not certain. The accuracy of caries detection with digital and conventional images is similar [25,26]. Because CBCT is a relatively new imaging modality, its diagnostic potential for caries detection is unclear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies about proximal carries detection [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and occlusal carries detection by CBCT [16,[21][22][23][24][25] are controversial. Most of the articles concluded that CBCT is not better than intraoral films in carries detection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%