2016
DOI: 10.17219/dmp/62075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Phosphor Storage Plate for Detection of Noncavitated Occlusal Caries

Abstract: More than 75% of dental caries in children and adolescents occurs in occlusal surfaces [1]. Studies over the past two decades have shown that a significant portion of occlusal caries could not be diagnosed in the early stages because of various reasons including dentists' carelessness and inappropriate instruments [2]. Researchers believe that the diagnosis of occlusal caries was more difficult AbstractBackground. Recent Studies have shown that a significant portion of occlusal caries could not be diagnosed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 2 10 ] Despite the advantages of digital system, the efficacy of some software enhancement features is still questionable because in some cases, software manipulation of digital radiographs may result in false-positive caries detection and lead to incorrect diagnosis and treatment. [ 11 12 ] Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of denoising and enhancement filters for approximal caries detection on digital radiographs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 2 10 ] Despite the advantages of digital system, the efficacy of some software enhancement features is still questionable because in some cases, software manipulation of digital radiographs may result in false-positive caries detection and lead to incorrect diagnosis and treatment. [ 11 12 ] Thus, this study aimed to assess the efficacy of denoising and enhancement filters for approximal caries detection on digital radiographs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%