1970
DOI: 10.1016/0040-1625(70)90161-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The design of a policy Delphi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
0
2

Year Published

1971
1971
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 452 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
134
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, it can be employed as a means of structuring and discussing diverse but informed views on a particular issue, as in the Policy Delphi (Turoff, 1970). In our study, we did not particularly seek or anticipate consensus: rather, we ran three separate Delphi groups, each with different stakeholder types, on the assumption that their views on how to measure recovery would likely be diverse and cross-group agreement would probably be limited.…”
Section: According Tomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Likewise, it can be employed as a means of structuring and discussing diverse but informed views on a particular issue, as in the Policy Delphi (Turoff, 1970). In our study, we did not particularly seek or anticipate consensus: rather, we ran three separate Delphi groups, each with different stakeholder types, on the assumption that their views on how to measure recovery would likely be diverse and cross-group agreement would probably be limited.…”
Section: According Tomentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The policy Delphi method has an advantage over more traditional interviewing because it incorporates education and consensus building into the process of data collection. In most Delphi studies, experts are asked to generate items through a first-round, open-ended procedure13 14 using mailed questionnaires rather than face-to-face meetings 1115.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A policy Delphi modifies those goals somewhat and seeks to develop pro and con arguments about policy issues and their resolutions [5,6,10,12,13]. This technique, employed here, allows a panel of experts to contribute elements to a complex situation with the intention of building a composite model of the situation under study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%