1978
DOI: 10.1243/emed_jour_1978_007_006_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Design and Evaluation of a Burn Wound Covering

Abstract: A burn wound covering based on an acrylonitrile-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate copolymer membrane is described. The requirements for a burn wound covering are discussed and a particular requirement, that of adequate water vapour permeability, is considered in detail. The effects on membrane water vapour permeability of contacting the membrane with ethylene oxide gas and of incorporating plasticizers are reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitatively speaking, the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR, defined as the steady flow of water vapor per unit area of surface in unit time at a specified humidity and temperature 30 ) of the SF is ~800 tested by ASTM (American Society for Testing Materials) E96-98 31 32 33 34 . And the WVTR of the normal skin is reported to be 200–500 gm −2 day −1 31 35 36 , thus, despite the existence of the device, the skin under it can breathe normally. Consequently, the device can be left in place for 7 days when considering the biocompatibility alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitatively speaking, the water vapor transmission rate (WVTR, defined as the steady flow of water vapor per unit area of surface in unit time at a specified humidity and temperature 30 ) of the SF is ~800 tested by ASTM (American Society for Testing Materials) E96-98 31 32 33 34 . And the WVTR of the normal skin is reported to be 200–500 gm −2 day −1 31 35 36 , thus, despite the existence of the device, the skin under it can breathe normally. Consequently, the device can be left in place for 7 days when considering the biocompatibility alone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the sensor size can be significantly scaled down with the pattern width as small as 100 and 50 μm, represented in Figure S5, Supporting Information. The sticky and stretchable patch presented here exhibited unprecedented water permeability (>20 g h –1 m –2 at a thickness of 250 μm) because of its porous structure, measured according to ASTM F1249 (standard test method for water vapor transmission rate using a modulated infrared sensor), which is generally sufficient and more than the normal skin permeability of 8–20 g h –1 m –2 . Moreover, the films with water vapor permeability (WVP) of 20–40 g h –1 m –2 are also reported but are not adherent to skins. , Recently, in comparison to polydimethylsiloxane, Ecoflex, and Solaris, the stretchable elastomeric material Silbione (RT Gel 4717 A/B, Bluestar Silicones, USA) showed promising characteristics of the material like stretchability and sticky nature with WVP as ∼10 g h –1 m –2 at a thickness of 100 μm, but it is very expensive . In comparison to the above-mentioned materials, the patch exhibited high WVP values with stretchability and sticky nature.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…2 b). Given that the WVTR of normal skin is 150–450 g m −2 day −1 , the fabricated biofilm-textile composites remained breathable 48 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%