2008
DOI: 10.1080/14330237.2008.10820202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Design and Evaluation of a Hope Enhancement Programme for Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current replication analyses, such studies were excluded unless missing data could be imputed from other relevant sources. For example, if standard deviations for an outcome measure were missing in one study/experiment but were reported elsewhere (e.g., for another study/experiment within the same article), the missing standard deviations were imputed from the available ones to allow the calculation of effect sizes (e.g., Pretorious et al [108]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current replication analyses, such studies were excluded unless missing data could be imputed from other relevant sources. For example, if standard deviations for an outcome measure were missing in one study/experiment but were reported elsewhere (e.g., for another study/experiment within the same article), the missing standard deviations were imputed from the available ones to allow the calculation of effect sizes (e.g., Pretorious et al [108]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there exists research in other settings that suggests that PPIs can have positive impacts on the mental health of individuals (see Friedman et al, 2019; Friedman et al, 2017; Hendriks et al, 2019; Pretorius, Venter, Temane, & Wissing, 2008; Weiss et al, 2016), the majority of interventions have focused on healthy urban populations (Addley et al, 2014; Page & Vella‐Brodrick, 2013) and clinical populations (Chakhssi et al, 2018; Macaskill, 2016) rather than on non‐clinical, but low‐income rural populations. There are limited impact evaluations of well‐being interventions in Africa (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited impact evaluations of well‐being interventions in Africa (e.g. Pretorius et al, 2008; Rugira, Nienaber, & Wissing, 2015; Teodorczuk, Guse, & du Plessis, 2019; Van Zyl & Rothmann, 2012), particularly in the Ghanaian context, but the evidence that does exist suggests positive trends that are worth exploring further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the RCT design is considered the gold standard in clinical research which may result in high-quality data that permits the description of causal relationships (Hariton & Locascio, 2018 ; Spieth et al, 2016 ), the design has been critiqued in the psychological and social domains, particularly due to its limitations in clarifying the processes that lead to the evidence that it demonstrates (see American Psychological Association, 2006 ; Bohlin & Sager, 2011 ). The majority of PPIs in the African context evaluate the effect of the implemented interventions mainly by quantitative methodology and with samples predominantly from South Africa who were mostly drawn from urban and educational settings (e.g., Bach & Guse, 2015 ; Pretorius et al, 2008 ; Van Zyl & Rothmann, 2012 ). In Ghana, there is paucity of research that evaluates PPIs in any population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%