The dependence of patient dose on factors relating to the technique and complexity of Interventional Cardiology procedures

Delichas, Miltiadis G.; Psarrakos, Kyriakos; Hatziioannou, Konstantinos; Giannoglou, Georgios; Molyvda-Athanasopoulou, E.; Papanastassiou, Emmanouil; Sioundas, Anastasios

doi:10.1016/s1120-1797(05)80004-3

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The average DAP of 158.2 Gycm 2 found in this study is within the range reported in the literature (28.5-370.6 Gycm 2 ) [24,[36][37][38][39][40][41], but higher than the reference dose level of 75 Gycm 2 established by the European Cardiology research programme DIMOND [37]. A 300 Gycm 2 threshold has also been set for probable induction of skin injury by the European DIMOND research programme.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

“…Numerous studies have found that the radiation dose varies significantly according to tube angulations, particularly in the combination of steep left anterior oblique (LAO) with cranial or caudal angulations [24][25][26][27]. However, there are no published data on whether the radiation dose with biplane or single-plane imaging during coronary angioplasty differs between the three vascular territories: right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex/intermediate (LCX).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty

Sadick¹,

Reed²,

Collins³

et al. 2010

BJR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Coronary angioplasties can be performed with either single-plane or biplane imaging techniques. The aim of this study was to determine whether biplane imaging, in comparison to single-plane imaging, reduces radiation dose and contrast load and shortens procedural time during (i) primary and elective coronary angioplasty procedures, (ii) angioplasty to the main vascular territories and (iii) procedures performed by operators with various levels of experience. This prospective observational study included a total of 504 primary and elective single-vessel coronary angioplasty procedures utilising either biplane or single-plane imaging. Radiographic and clinical parameters were collected from clinical reports and examination protocols. Radiation dose was measured by a dose-area-product (DAP) meter intrinsic to the angiography system. Our results showed that biplane imaging delivered a significantly greater radiation dose (181.4¡121.0 Gycm 2 ) than single-plane imaging (133.6¡92.8 Gycm 2 , p,0.0001). The difference was independent of case type (primary or elective) (p50.862), vascular territory (p50.519) and operator experience (p50.903). No significant difference was found in contrast load between biplane (166.8¡62.9 ml) and single-plane imaging (176.8¡66.0 ml) (p50.302). This non-significant difference was independent of case type (p50.551), vascular territory (p50.308) and operator experience (p50.304). Procedures performed with biplane imaging were significantly longer (55.3¡27.8 min) than those with single-plane (48.9¡24.2 min, p50.010) and, similarly, were not dependent on case type (p50.226), vascular territory (p50.642) or operator experience (p50.094). Biplane imaging resulted in a greater radiation dose and a longer procedural time and delivered a non-significant reduction in contrast load than single-plane imaging. These findings did not support the commonly perceived advantages of using biplane imaging in single-vessel coronary interventional procedures.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty

Sadick¹,

Reed²,

Collins³

et al. 2010

BJR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…minimising the X-ray dose to the patient while preserving the quality of treatment), the use of low fluoroscopy pulse rate, image intensifier field size and collimation are recommended [1,12,13]. However, the studies that concluded that there was an impact on dose of some technical parameters had mostly used descriptive or univariate analyses and/or were carried out on a phantom [2,4,14,15]. Few studies have used multivariate methods to analyse the dose variation on patients' skin [13,16].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…First of all, the dose to the patient increases with increasing body mass index (BMI) [1][2][3]. Second, dose, fluoroscopy time and number of cine frames might differ depending on the number of treated vessels and/or stenoses [4][5][6], localisation and severity of lesions [2,7], stage of occlusion [7,8], tortuosity of treated vessels [6][7][8], number of stents and balloons [2,4,[7][8][9], and artery approach [10,11]. With the aim of optimising the interventional cardiology procedures (i.e.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures

Journy

Sinno‐Tellier²,

Maccia³

et al. 2012

BJR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The study aimed to characterise the factors related to the X-ray dose delivered to the patient's skin during interventional cardiology procedures. Methods: We studied 177 coronary angiographies (CAs) and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs) carried out in a French clinic on the same radiography table. The clinical and therapeutic characteristics, and the technical parameters of the procedures, were collected. The dose area product (DAP) and the maximum skin dose (MSD) were measured by an ionisation chamber (Diamentor; Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) and radiosensitive film (Gafchromic; International Specialty Products Advanced Materials Group, Wayne, NJ). Multivariate analyses were used to assess the effects of the factors of interest on dose. Results: The mean MSD and DAP were respectively 389 mGy and 65 Gy cm 22 for CAs, and 916 mGy and 69 Gy cm 22 for PTCAs. For 8% of the procedures, the MSD exceeded 2 Gy. Although a linear relationship between the MSD and the DAP was observed for CAs (r50.93), a simple extrapolation of such a model to PTCAs would lead to an inadequate assessment of the risk, especially for the highest dose values. For PTCAs, the body mass index, the therapeutic complexity, the fluoroscopy time and the number of cine frames were independent explanatory factors of the MSD, whoever the practitioner was. Moreover, the effect of technical factors such as collimation, cinematography settings and X-ray tube orientations on the DAP was shown. Conclusion: Optimising the technical options for interventional procedures and training staff on radiation protection might notably reduce the dose and ultimately avoid patient skin lesions. Interventional cardiology procedures such as repeated diagnostic coronary angiographies (CAs) and/or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties (PTCAs) may cause radio-induced skin damage. Deterministic skin effects might occur as soon as the dose to the patient's skin exceeds 2 Gy and might correspond to a range of lesions from erythema to necrosis [1]. In relation to the risk of skin lesions, the X-ray dose depends on clinical, therapeutic and technical factors. First of all, the dose to the patient increases with increasing body mass index (BMI) [1][2][3]. Second, dose, fluoroscopy time and number of cine frames might differ depending on the number of treated vessels and/or stenoses [4][5][6], localisation and severity of lesions [2,7], stage of occlusion [7,8], tortuosity of treated vessels [6][7][8], number of stents and balloons [2,4,[7][8][9], and artery approach [10,11]. With the aim of optimising the interventional cardiology procedures (i.e. minimising the X-ray dose to the patient while preserving the quality of treatment), the use of low fluoroscopy pulse rate, image intensifier field size and collimation are recommended [1,12,13]. However, the studies that concluded that there was an impact on dose of some technical parameters had mostly used descriptive or univariate analyses and/or were carried out on a phantom [2,...

show abstract

“…Delichas et al found that the radiation dose to the patient is influenced by the individual characteristics of each interventional procedure [76]. The maximal annual dose values received by 9 cardiologists during 144 cardiac procedures in two hospitals in their study were found to be 1.9 and 2.8 mSv, which are much higher than the reference levels defined by the European DIMOND approach [77].…”

Section: Radiation-induced Risks To Patientsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Radiation-Induced Noncancer Risks in Interventional Cardiology: Optimisation of Procedures and Staff and Patient Dose Reduction

Sun

AbAziz

Yusof

2013

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Concerns about ionizing radiation during interventional cardiology have been increased in recent years as a result of rapid growth in interventional procedure volumes and the high radiation doses associated with some procedures. Noncancer radiation risks to cardiologists and medical staff in terms of radiation-induced cataracts and skin injuries for patients appear clear potential consequences of interventional cardiology procedures, while radiation-induced potential risk of developing cardiovascular effects remains less clear. This paper provides an overview of the evidence-based reviews of concerns about noncancer risks of radiation exposure in interventional cardiology. Strategies commonly undertaken to reduce radiation doses to both medical staff and patients during interventional cardiology procedures are discussed; optimisation of interventional cardiology procedures is highlighted.

show abstract

The dependence of patient dose on factors relating to the technique and complexity of Interventional Cardiology procedures

Cited by 7 publications

References 16 publications

Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty

Impact of biplane versus single-plane imaging on radiation dose, contrast load and procedural time in coronary angioplasty

Main clinical, therapeutic and technical factors related to patient's maximum skin dose in interventional cardiology procedures

Radiation-Induced Noncancer Risks in Interventional Cardiology: Optimisation of Procedures and Staff and Patient Dose Reduction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About