2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/976962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation-Induced Noncancer Risks in Interventional Cardiology: Optimisation of Procedures and Staff and Patient Dose Reduction

Abstract: Concerns about ionizing radiation during interventional cardiology have been increased in recent years as a result of rapid growth in interventional procedure volumes and the high radiation doses associated with some procedures. Noncancer radiation risks to cardiologists and medical staff in terms of radiation-induced cataracts and skin injuries for patients appear clear potential consequences of interventional cardiology procedures, while radiation-induced potential risk of developing cardiovascular effects r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…cumulative dose dependant), and the severity of the reaction or cell injury will increase as the dose exceeds the threshold [27]. Therefore, it is very important to be aware of the radiation dose and to implement dose reduction strategies during interventional radiology procedures because radiation exposure is a significant concern for interventionalists and patients due to the increasing workloads and increasing complexity of procedures over the last decade [5,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cumulative dose dependant), and the severity of the reaction or cell injury will increase as the dose exceeds the threshold [27]. Therefore, it is very important to be aware of the radiation dose and to implement dose reduction strategies during interventional radiology procedures because radiation exposure is a significant concern for interventionalists and patients due to the increasing workloads and increasing complexity of procedures over the last decade [5,27,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large US population survey, CA and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were among the 20 imaging procedures that provided the largest contribution to annual cumulative radiation doses . Radiation‐induced skin injuries are a real risk in PCI with high cumulative skin doses . Both physicians and manufacturers are making efforts to implement new techniques in order to reduce the possible radiation risks, while maintaining an image quality that is sufficient for the respective clinical tasks .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main benefit of this approach is near elimination of radiation exposure for the cardiologist and the patient without increasing the procedural risk. This is especially important since the cumulative radiation exposure of cardiologists has been associated with adverse outcomes . Reducing radiation exposure has similar benefits for patients undergoing electrophysiology procedures that require access to the left atrium .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important since the cumulative radiation exposure of cardiologists has been associated with adverse outcomes. [12][13][14] Reducing radiation exposure has similar benefits for patients undergoing electrophysiology procedures that require access to the left atrium. 15 Furthermore, the catheter laboratory team does not require lead aprons, which are associated with significant morbidity when worn for long procedures such as complex catheter ablations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%