1977
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(77)90233-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The dependence of open field burning emissions and plume concentrations on meteorology, field conditions and ignition technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Imperial County's smoke management plan states that the Air Pollution Control District may put in place additional restrictions based on meteorological and air quality conditions, including strong ground-level or gusty winds (Imperial County APCD 2010). We observed substantial drift at a slightly greater wind speed (5.6 mph, or 2.7 meters per second) than that previously suggested for a vertical column of smoke to occur (4.5 mph, or 2.0 meters per second) (Carroll et al 1977). Local Air Pollution Control Districts could reduce groundlevel drift by specifying a ground-level wind speed above which burns should not take place.…”
Section: Public Health Recommendationscontrasting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Imperial County's smoke management plan states that the Air Pollution Control District may put in place additional restrictions based on meteorological and air quality conditions, including strong ground-level or gusty winds (Imperial County APCD 2010). We observed substantial drift at a slightly greater wind speed (5.6 mph, or 2.7 meters per second) than that previously suggested for a vertical column of smoke to occur (4.5 mph, or 2.0 meters per second) (Carroll et al 1977). Local Air Pollution Control Districts could reduce groundlevel drift by specifying a ground-level wind speed above which burns should not take place.…”
Section: Public Health Recommendationscontrasting
confidence: 49%
“…Although crop-specific particulate emission factors (grams particulate matter emitted/kilograms biomass burned) from burning bermudagrass stubble have not yet been developed, factors for other grasses, such as Kentucky bluegrass, are about twice those for rice and wheat (McCarthy 2011). The moisture level of burned residue can also significantly affect particulate matter emissions, with a change in moisture from 10% to 25% more than tripling particulate emissions during the burning of rice, wheat and barley straw (Carroll et al 1977).…”
Section: Information For the General Publicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From wood fuel, Akeredolu (1989) reported CO emission of about 6:42 10 9 kg in Nigeria. In open burning, PM 10 emission increases with increasing moisture content (Carroll et al, 1977). Locally produced PM from combustion processes influence the aerosols in Lagos (Maduekwe and Chendo, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fires spread in all directions, but the relationship between wind, slope and fire spread is controlled by igniting fires upwind (backing fire), downwind (head fire), or in the middle (spot, flank or grid fire) of unburned areas with available fuels (Wade and Lunsford 1989). Each fire spread pattern has different behaviour characteristics, even if fuel and weather conditions are held constant (Carroll et al 1977;Fernandes et al 2009). For example, because head fires move with the wind, they spread and burn fuel at faster rates, with higher fire intensity CSIRO PUBLISHING International Journal of Wildland Fire 2011, 20, 474-477 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ijwf (kW m À1 ), larger flaming zone depths of both flaming and smouldering combustion, and higher amounts of smoke produced (largely due to the by-products of smouldering combustion; Carroll et al 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each fire spread pattern has different behaviour characteristics, even if fuel and weather conditions are held constant (Carroll et al 1977;Fernandes et al 2009). For example, because head fires move with the wind, they spread and burn fuel at faster rates, with higher fire intensity CSIRO PUBLISHING International Journal of Wildland Fire 2011, 20, 474-477 www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ijwf (kW m À1 ), larger flaming zone depths of both flaming and smouldering combustion, and higher amounts of smoke produced (largely due to the by-products of smouldering combustion; Carroll et al 1977). In contrast, backing fires have lower intensities, shorter flame lengths, slower rates of spread (Wade and Lunsford 1989), and have been shown to produce half the amount of smoke (Carroll et al 1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%