2020
DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2020.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The demography of human warfare can drive sex differences in altruism

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Cant and Johntone (2008) suggest that the evolution of menopause in humans can be partly explained by an asymmetry in relatedness to offspring between older and younger women that results from female dispersal. Similarly, kin selection modelling by Micheletti et al (2017) suggests that sex-differences in relatedness to the group may lead to intrafamilial conflicts of interest with respect to the fitness benefits of engaging in intergroup violence and differences in the benefits of altruistic behaviour towards groupmates Micheletti, Ruxton & Gardner (2020). Assessing the plausibility of such hypotheses for human social evolution requires more than average relatedness; we also need detailed data on age and sex differences in residence patterns and relatedness to group mates, patterns described by Croft et al (2021) as 'kinship dynamics'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cant and Johntone (2008) suggest that the evolution of menopause in humans can be partly explained by an asymmetry in relatedness to offspring between older and younger women that results from female dispersal. Similarly, kin selection modelling by Micheletti et al (2017) suggests that sex-differences in relatedness to the group may lead to intrafamilial conflicts of interest with respect to the fitness benefits of engaging in intergroup violence and differences in the benefits of altruistic behaviour towards groupmates Micheletti, Ruxton & Gardner (2020). Assessing the plausibility of such hypotheses for human social evolution requires more than average relatedness; we also need detailed data on age and sex differences in residence patterns and relatedness to group mates, patterns described by Croft et al (2021) as 'kinship dynamics'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the Choi and Bowles model assumes that all parochial altruists will go to war, whereas in actual human societies, active participation in war is usually restricted to young men (12,22). Negative fitness consequences of parochial altruism in noncombatants would mean that altruism is less likely to evolve and may lead to intrafamilial and intergenerational conflicts of interest, especially if the spoils of war are unequally distributed (22,23).…”
Section: Anthropologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since direct evidence of past selection pressures on altruism and war are unavailable to us, we rely on exploring the coevolutionary dynamics of parochial and altruistic behaviors using mathematical or computational modeling. Several models exploring parochial altruism have been advanced (2-4, 13, 21) as part of a wider literature on the possible impact of warfare on the evolution of human sociality (22)(23)(24)(25). Of these models of parochial altruism, arguably the most influential is a model by Choi and Bowles (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undeniably, the most affected part of the population is usually the category of young males. The demography of human warfare can drive sex differences in altruism, as recent research demonstrates (Micheletti, Ruxton and Gardner, 2020). Likewise, on the molecular (genetic) "level", the ecology of warfare drives the evolution of sex-biased dispersal; sex-biased dispersal modulates intrafamily and intragenomic conflicts in relation to warfare and an ecological perspective of conflicts at the levels of the gene, individual, and social group yields novel predictions as to pathologies associated with mutations and epimutations at loci underpinning human violence" (Micheletti, Ruxton and Gardner, 2017, p. 1).…”
Section: These Terms Refer To Two Kinds Of Field Research Done and Viewpoints Obtained: The Emic From Within The Social Group/ Individualmentioning
confidence: 99%