2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01415.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Delay Hypothesis: The Manifestation of Media Effects Over Time

Abstract: A between-participants experiment (N = 147) tested for the presence of a delayed effect following exposure to an episode of a legal drama that contained false information. Participants were more likely to endorse false beliefs if they were queried two weeks after watching the program rather than immediately following exposure. The relationship between time and false belief endorsement was found to be moderated by perceived reality of the program. Consistent with the delay hypothesis, those who perceived the le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
35
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(85 reference statements)
4
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, because work suggests that false evidence from fiction can displace factual knowledge (Marsh et al, 2003;Marsh & Fazio, 2006), we might expect fiction to have longer-lasting effects. At least two recent studies show that fictional media can have what Hovland, Lumsdaine, and Sheffield (1949) called a sleeper effect, where the effects of fiction on beliefs actually increase over time (Appel & Richter, 2007), even when the information is false and perceived realism is low (Jensen, Bernat, Wilson, & Goonewardene, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, because work suggests that false evidence from fiction can displace factual knowledge (Marsh et al, 2003;Marsh & Fazio, 2006), we might expect fiction to have longer-lasting effects. At least two recent studies show that fictional media can have what Hovland, Lumsdaine, and Sheffield (1949) called a sleeper effect, where the effects of fiction on beliefs actually increase over time (Appel & Richter, 2007), even when the information is false and perceived realism is low (Jensen, Bernat, Wilson, & Goonewardene, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is until the recent rise in use of digital advertising channels. Post 1970s, the sleeper effect was cited as an interesting theory or persuasive effect in advertising (Eisend and Langner 2010;Lariscey and Tinkham 1999) and other mass communication channels (Jensen et al 2011). The sleeper effect has also been used to describe attitude changes over time (Maehle and Supphellen 2013), rather than the classical sleeper effect of an increase in attitudes when a message is accompanied by a discounting cue.…”
Section: Criticisms Of the Sleeper Effect And Sleeper Effect Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These logical conditions offer more stringent guidelines for sleeper effect claims (Jensen et al 2011). Figure 1 illustrates three possible effects.…”
Section: Place Figure 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such persuasive effects have been demonstrated for information that was central to the theme of a story (e.g., a dangerous psychiatric patient; Green & Brock, 2000) and for peripheral details that are not of particular relevance to the causal chain of events (e.g., Prentice, Gerrig, & Bailis, 1997;Wheeler, Green, & Brock, 1999; for an overview, see Green & Donahue, 2009), and they seem to be long-lasting (Appel, 2008;Appel & Richter, 2007;Jensen, Bernat, Wilson, & Goonwardene, 2011). For explaining the persuasive impact of stories, several theoretical models have been proposed which start from the idea that the comprehension of narratives can involve the experience of being transported into the narrative (Gerrig, 1993;Green & Brock, 2000.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%