2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00058.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The deinstitutionalization of American marriage

Abstract: This article argues that marriage has undergone a process of deinstitutionalization—a weakening of the social norms that define partners' behavior—over the past few decades. Examples are presented involving the increasing number and complexity of cohabiting unions and the emergence of same‐sex marriage. Two transitions in the meaning of marriage that occurred in the United States during the 20th century have created the social context for deinstitutionalization. The first transition, noted by Ernest Burgess, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

52
1,196
1
35

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,310 publications
(1,334 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(22 reference statements)
52
1,196
1
35
Order By: Relevance
“…In many Western societies, demographic changes and family transformations, including formation of OPH, have been linked to greater emphasis on self-realization, self-actualization, self-fulfilment, and to deinstitutionalization and disembedding of social systems (see Cherlin 2004;Giddens 1992;Lesthaeghe and Surkyn 2007). While to a certain extent globalization and modernity have emphasized individual desires, they have not weakened social institutions in India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many Western societies, demographic changes and family transformations, including formation of OPH, have been linked to greater emphasis on self-realization, self-actualization, self-fulfilment, and to deinstitutionalization and disembedding of social systems (see Cherlin 2004;Giddens 1992;Lesthaeghe and Surkyn 2007). While to a certain extent globalization and modernity have emphasized individual desires, they have not weakened social institutions in India.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using empirical results from relevant literature, we test the following hypotheses about socioeconomic determinants in the current study: Family life -cohabitation versus marriage: Declining marriage rates and increasing cohabitation rates are crucial elements of family change in recent decades, and the meaning of marriage has altered over time (Cherlin 2004a(Cherlin , 2004bAmato et al 2007). Love, sexuality, and childbearing are no longer inextricably entwined with marriage (Zwaan 1993).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the negative effects of parental divorce are greater among more advantaged children because they are less accustomed to disruptive socioeconomic events and disadvantaged circumstances than more disadvantaged children (McLoyd et al 2000). They are consequently unlikely to be embedded in a social network in which family instability is anticipated, or at least less stigmatized (Brand and Simon Thomas 2014;Cherlin 2004;McDermott, Fowler, and Christakis 2013;Ross 1995). 3 By contrast, parental divorce may not further encumber the educational attainment of children who have grown accustomed to disruption in their lives, such as job loss, health shocks, residential mobility, and income decline (Duncan et al 1998).…”
Section: Heterogeneous Effects Of Parental Divorce On Children's Educmentioning
confidence: 99%