2010
DOI: 10.1080/87568220903558570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Debate about Increasing College Student Psychopathology: Are College Students Really Getting “Sicker?”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, a central discussion concerns whether the observed increase reflects more focus on and openness regarding mental health problems rather than changes in experiences of distress per se (Baxter et al, 2014 ; Collishaw, 2015 ; Much & Swanson, 2010 ). That is, whether these factors have improved recognition of and/or lowered the threshold to report mental health problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, a central discussion concerns whether the observed increase reflects more focus on and openness regarding mental health problems rather than changes in experiences of distress per se (Baxter et al, 2014 ; Collishaw, 2015 ; Much & Swanson, 2010 ). That is, whether these factors have improved recognition of and/or lowered the threshold to report mental health problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the result of these trends, many college and university counseling centers have found it necessary to adapt their approaches (Kitzrow, 2003;Much & Swanson, 2010). Consistent with the national trends, senior clinicians within Sarah Lawrence College (SLC) Health Services perceived a rise in the number of students presenting with significant psychopathology, specifically students who met criteria for BPD and reported a history of suicidal ideation, NSIB, and comorbid Axis I psychopathology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Research suggests that providing feedback to clinicians regarding client progress positively affects treatment outcomes, reduces the likelihood of clinical deterioration, and enhances the likelihood of positive outcomes even for clients who showed an initial poor response to treatment (Lambert, 2010;Lambert et al, 2003;Maruish, 1999;Reese, Norsworthy, & Rowlands, 2009 Evaluating Clinical Significance Jacobson and Truax (1991) introduced a method to enable researchers and clinicians to determine whether any particular client achieved "clinically significant change." To do so, a client's change score on a measure is rated on two criteria.…”
Section: Tracking Individual Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%