2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1907.10688
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI)

Abstract: We present the status of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) and its plans and opportunities for the coming decade. DESI construction and its initial five years of operations are an approved experiment of the U.S. Department of Energy and is summarized here as context for the Astro2020 panel. Beyond 2025, DESI will require new funding to continue operations. We expect that DESI will remain one of the world's best facilities for wide-field spectroscopy throughout the decade. More about the DESI inst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We plan to apply our methodology to mitigate the effects of strong molecular carbon veiling, which complicates identification of the continuum around the region of the Ca H & K lines and the CH G-band for other cool CEMP EMP/UMP candidates from: 1) our ongoing "Best and Farthest" survey (Yoon et al 2018a), observing with LBT/MODS and Gemini/GMOS, 2) numerous other cool CEMP stars with strong carbon veiling observed during the course of follow-up spectroscopy over the past few decades of metal-poor candidates from the HK survey (e.g., Beers et al 1992), 3) the list of CEMP candidates provided by Christlieb et al (2008), and 4) very cool CEMP stars from the medium-resolution spectroscopic surveys such as the SDSS, the AAOmega Evolution of Galactic Structure (AEGIS) survey (Yoon et al 2018b), and the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope survey (LAMOST; Cui et al 2012). This methodology can be widely applicable to numerous data from the future large moderate-resolution spectroscopic surveys such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument(DESI; Levi et al 2019) survey, the William Herschel Telescope Enhanced Area Velocity Explorer (WEAVE; Dalton et al 2018) and 4MOST (de Jong et al 2019). These efforts will allow us not only to expedite the discovery process of the most metal-poor stars, but also to calculate frequencies of CEMP groups separately, and, in turn, provide insights regarding the shape of the FIMF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We plan to apply our methodology to mitigate the effects of strong molecular carbon veiling, which complicates identification of the continuum around the region of the Ca H & K lines and the CH G-band for other cool CEMP EMP/UMP candidates from: 1) our ongoing "Best and Farthest" survey (Yoon et al 2018a), observing with LBT/MODS and Gemini/GMOS, 2) numerous other cool CEMP stars with strong carbon veiling observed during the course of follow-up spectroscopy over the past few decades of metal-poor candidates from the HK survey (e.g., Beers et al 1992), 3) the list of CEMP candidates provided by Christlieb et al (2008), and 4) very cool CEMP stars from the medium-resolution spectroscopic surveys such as the SDSS, the AAOmega Evolution of Galactic Structure (AEGIS) survey (Yoon et al 2018b), and the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope survey (LAMOST; Cui et al 2012). This methodology can be widely applicable to numerous data from the future large moderate-resolution spectroscopic surveys such as the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument(DESI; Levi et al 2019) survey, the William Herschel Telescope Enhanced Area Velocity Explorer (WEAVE; Dalton et al 2018) and 4MOST (de Jong et al 2019). These efforts will allow us not only to expedite the discovery process of the most metal-poor stars, but also to calculate frequencies of CEMP groups separately, and, in turn, provide insights regarding the shape of the FIMF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explore whether such distinctions are within the reach of next generation surveys of distance and structure growth. Such experiments being conceived include DESI2 [1], FOBOS [2], LSSTspec [3], Mauna Kea Spectroscopic Explorer [4], MegaMapper [5], SpecTel [6], not to mention those using not galaxies as tracers but intensity mapping, Lyman alpha forest, etc. (see, e.g., [7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, it is unclear whether the cool clouds are governed by random, inflowing, or outflowing motion (Lan & Mo 2019). In this paper, we explore the kinematics of MgII absorbers around a large sample of luminous red galaxies (LRGs) observed by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS; Dawson et al 2013) at 𝑧∼0.55, in ★ E-mail: yingzu@sjtu.edu.cn hopes of paving the path for a self-consistent redshift-space distortion (RSD) modelling of metal absorbers with upcoming spectroscopic surveys like the DESI (Levi et al 2019) and PFS (Takada et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%