The dangers of marginal cost based electricity pricing

Abstract

Led by energy and environmental policies the EU power sector is undergoing vast changes to achieve a market driven and sustainable future. Market based price discovery and different renewable support schemes are seen as key solutions in achieving the desired future production mix. Most liquid power markets use marginal cost based price discovery where the price is set by marginal costs of the last producer needed to cover all load, usually a fossil fuel power plant. At the same time the majority of new investments are made with significant help from government support schemes in renewable production capacities, which have very low marginal costs. The increasing share of renewable production will thus impact price levels in day-ahead markets. This paper analyses the potential impact of more renewable electricity production on price discovery in the NordPool Spot market, which already has a high share of renewable electricity traded. Results show that ceteris paribus NordPool Spot is likely to have very high price volatility in the future and alternative revenue sources are required for new investments.

The Quintuple Helix Model: Cooperation system for a sustainable electric power industry in Mexico

“…Similarly, the government can incentivize renewable energy development by establishing strategic plans and mechanisms such as green subsidies for clean and renewable energy and imposing carbon or energy taxes on conventional energy sources, to modify the levels of fossil energy production and consumption (Abdmouleh et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2017). This contributes to improving the efficiency of capital allocation in the electricity sector because the externalities (costs imposed on society due to air pollution and climate change) derived from the use of fossil fuels are not fully valued in the electric energy price (Pikk and Viiding, 2014;Taylor, 2020). Likewise, it is of utmost importance to avoid the loss of electricity, which, can be caused by storage, transformation, transportation, and distribution, as well as administrative errors, anomalies in metering, self-connected customers, and electricity theft (Vargas et al, 2016;CEPAL, 2022).…”

From private to public governance: The case for reconfiguring energy systems as a commons

“…However, they also open up the possibility for democratizing electricity if governed as a commons. Within the dominant political economy, democratizing electricity would reduce profit maximization as more and more local actors enter the market [44] . So the incentives for new investments by the private sector would decrease hindering the proliferation of renewables via the electricity markets.…”

A comparative study of marginal loss pricing algorithms in electricity markets

“…In the power pool market, the market operator (MO) receives energy offers from producers and energy bids from consumers for specified trading interval, and determines the power production of every producer, the consumption level of every consumer, and the price at which every producer/consumer is paid/charged for its energy production/consumption [16]. The objective of market is to pass the generation cost to consumers in a fair and efficient way [17]. Thus, the lossless market clearing model for LMP calculation with the energy price and the congestion price can be formulated as follows.…”