The Dalmatian Pelican, Pelecanus crispus, Nesting in Mediterranean Lagoons in Albania and Turkey

Peja, N.; Sarigul, G.; Siki, Mehmet; Crivellì, Alain J.

doi:10.2307/1521962

Cited by 9 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…T. BAKKER (in KIRWAN et al 2008) found 60-80 pairs in 2003. The breeding population data collected by HEINS et al (1990), PEJA et al (1996) between 1989, KIRWAN et al (2008 in 2003 and our own observations in 2010 are presented in Fig. 3.…”

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 76%

“…Since 1985, however, they breed in Homa Lagoon only. The breeding population data collected by SIKI between 1982(SIKI 1985, PEJA et al 1996, SARIGÜL 2000, by ONMUù (2008) . Conservation efforts (SIKI, ONMUù unpubl.…”

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Additionally, immigration from other colonies in the region (CRIVELLI, unpubl.) cannot be ruled out; the low breeding success, which is between 0.8 and 1.0 young per pair (PEJA et al 1996, EKEN 1997 (SIKI 1985, PEJA et al 1996, EKEN 1997, SARIGÜL 2000, ONMUù 2008. , PEJA et al 1996, SARIGÜL 2000, KIRWAN et al 2008.…”

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, PEJA et al 1996, SARIGÜL 2000, KIRWAN et al 2008. , PEJA et al 1996, SARIGÜL 2000. T. BAKKER (in KIRWAN et al 2008) found 60-80 pairs in 2003.…”

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Status and development of the population of the globally threatened Dalmatian Pelican,Pelecanus crispus, in Turkey

Onmuş

Siki

Sarigul

et al. 2011

Zoology in the Middle East

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Dalmatian Pelican, Pelecanus crispus (Bruch, 1832), used to be a widespread breeding species in Turkey in the past. Until the 1990s, approximately 473-763 pairs were breeding at 20-25 sites. Of these, 53-59% have been lost due to drainage of wetlands, 17-19% due to direct persecution, 16-22% due to both drainage and persecution, and 6-8% due to water level increase. Currently there are only five active breeding colonies: Gediz Delta, Manyas Lake, Büyük Menderes Delta, Aktaú Lake and IúÕklÕ Lake. The colony at IúÕklÕ Lake was discovered in 2010 and comprises 6 pairs. Since 2000, the total breeding population of Dalmatian Pelicans increased moderately from 220-250 to 277-341 pairs. Likewise, the wintering population has also increased from 352 up to 2,344 individuals, which seems to be linked with the increase in the breeding population in the region. Nevertheless, the population size still renders the species susceptible to the risks affecting small populations.

show abstract

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 76%

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…, PEJA et al 1996, SARIGÜL 2000, KIRWAN et al 2008. , PEJA et al 1996, SARIGÜL 2000. T. BAKKER (in KIRWAN et al 2008) found 60-80 pairs in 2003.…”

Section: Breeding Populationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Status and development of the population of the globally threatened Dalmatian Pelican,Pelecanus crispus, in Turkey

Onmuş

Siki

Sarigul

et al. 2011

Zoology in the Middle East

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1) coastal lagoon (Peja et al 1996). They also bred at Malik and Terbuf Lakes, from at least the 1930s, but disappeared after drainage in the late 1950s.…”

Section: Dalmatian Pelican Breeding Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

Current status of the Dalmatian pelican and the great white pelican populations of the Black Sea/Mediterranean flyway

Catsadorakis¹,

Onmuş²,

Bugariu³

et al. 2015

Endang. Species. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Dalmatian pelican (DP) Pelecanus crispu s and the great white pelican (GWP) Pelecanus onocrotalus are listed as 'Vulnerable' and 'Least Concern', respectively, in the IUCN Red List. We present an updated estimation of the Black Sea / Mediterranean flyway population status of both species, based on data provided by experts working in all 7 countries of the region where pelicans breed and/or overwinter, who came together at the 1st Workshop on Pelican Research and Conservation in Prespa, Greece. The DP breeding population in the Black Sea and Mediterranean countries increased from 1730−2105 pairs in the years 2000−2010 to 2154−2437 pairs in 2011−2012. Approximately 40% of the Palaearctic breeding population of GWP occurred in Southeast Europe and Turkey. In 2011−2012 the GWP population in this region was estimated to be 4702−5175 pairs, and has remained more or less stable during the last decade. Although all the breeding sites for both species are in protected areas, disturbance at nesting places was considered to be the main threat. Direct persecution and electric power lines still cause occasional problems. In deltaic lagoons, erosion and inundation of nesting sites cause breeding failures in DPs, while in inland wetlands large water level fluctuations are a widespread problem. Decrease of fish stocks is a threat, especially in coastal areas. Many stop-over wetlands along GWP migration routes between Southeast Europe and Africa have been seriously degraded or have disappeared, resulting in serious implications for their populations. Conservation needs are listed, but further research is recommended for both species.

show abstract

Spatially correlated environmental factors drive synchronisation in populations of the Dalmatian Pelican

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Spatial synchrony in population dynamics has been documented recently across a range of taxa, and a number of hypotheses about the mechanisms driving spatial synchrony and the consequences of this phenomenon for the persistence of populations have emerged. Spatial environmental covariance is one of the principal factors influencing this synchrony on a large scale. However, most studies focus on population abundances, and little evidence exists on the spatial synchrony of demographic parameters. We used a 15-year dataset from two populations of a vulnerable bird species, the Dalmatian Pelican (Pelecanus crispus), to identify local and global environmental factors that cause population synchrony. We show that survival rates were temporally synchronised between the studied populations and that a large part ([50 % for both populations) of this covariation was driven by local environmental conditions. Several components of the North Atlantic Oscillation index were correlated with local climatic conditions, but not all of these components can be used as informative proxies for future variation in survival. We also present evidence that an individual's future survival can be strongly influenced by the conditions occurring during the early period of its life. Environmental factors such as water level and food availability had similar influences on breeding success and juvenile survival. Juvenile survival was lower during dry years and years of low food availability. This finding indicated that intraspecific competition may act as a limiting factor for species demography, especially in large populations. Estimating the strength of synchrony is important and should be considered in population and metapopulation analyses and in relationship to conservation measures.

show abstract

The Dalmatian Pelican, Pelecanus crispus, Nesting in Mediterranean Lagoons in Albania and Turkey

Cited by 9 publications

References 1 publication

Status and development of the population of the globally threatened Dalmatian Pelican,Pelecanus crispus, in Turkey

Status and development of the population of the globally threatened Dalmatian Pelican,Pelecanus crispus, in Turkey

Current status of the Dalmatian pelican and the great white pelican populations of the Black Sea/Mediterranean flyway

Spatially correlated environmental factors drive synchronisation in populations of the Dalmatian Pelican

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About