1989
DOI: 10.1016/0277-5379(89)90411-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cytocidal effect of high energy shock waves on human prostatic tumour cell lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significant extracellular efflux of these enzymes in the present study reflects damage to the cell membrane. Dam age to the cell membrane of the cells treated with HESW has been confirmed ultrastructurally in some reports [7,15], The mechanism by which HESW induces cell mem brane damage has not been clarified yet, but may be attributable to microcavitation [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The significant extracellular efflux of these enzymes in the present study reflects damage to the cell membrane. Dam age to the cell membrane of the cells treated with HESW has been confirmed ultrastructurally in some reports [7,15], The mechanism by which HESW induces cell mem brane damage has not been clarified yet, but may be attributable to microcavitation [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Renal tissue injury induced by shock waves is also de scribed [10][11][12], Russo et al [3] have demonstrated a dose-dependent cytotoxic effect of HESW. Since these initial experiments, a number of studies using different tumor types have been published [4,[13][14][15], The ob served antitumor effects were induced by necrosis and, as reported by Hoshi et al [2], medicated primarily by vas cular injury. However, the detailed mechanisms of the destruction effects of HESW on the living cells is un known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis is supported on the one hand by studies investigating the effects of direct sound field changes by using different driving voltages of the shockwave device. Results by Dongen et al who treated a suspension of human prostate carcinoma cells showed differing cell survivals associated with the application of different shockwave fields (driving voltages 14.5 vs. 18.1 kV) [ 33 ]. And Maier et al discovered a change in tensile strength of gastrocnemius tendons of turkeys following shockwave treatment with 25 kV (energy density of 1.2 mJ/mm 2 ) in contrast to no measurable reaction at 15 kV (0.6 mJ/mm 2 ) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the setup on the biological reaction has been demonstrated for example by Cleveland et al in whose experiments the cell injury was significantly altered by a slight change of the shockwave field caused by different curvatures of the cell tubes [ 35 ]. Furthermore, experiments by Dongen et al, Steinbach et al, and Laudone et al revealed a dependence of the cell death on air trapped inside cell tubes [ 33 , 37 , 38 ]. These examples show clearly that study outcomes can be strongly influenced by the experimental setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%