2015
DOI: 10.1155/2015/506181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Current Testing Protocols for Biomechanical Evaluation of Lumbar Spinal Implants in Laboratory Setting: A Review of the Literature

Abstract: In vitro biomechanical investigations have become a routinely employed technique to explore new lumbar instrumentation. One of the most important advantages of such investigations is the low risk present when compared to clinical trials. However, the best use of any experimental data can be made when standard testing protocols are adopted by investigators, thus allowing comparisons among studies. Experimental variables, such as the length of the specimen, operative level, type of loading (e.g., dynamic versus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomechanical studies typically include assessments of load-displacement behavior of one or more functional spinal units (FSUs) under specific conditions. 8,13,21 The standard universal protocols include range of motion, stiffness, and hybrid testing. 13,21 The current study design mimics these protocols and prior PJK cadaveric studies in that specimens were unconstrained, with the magnitude and orientation of moments remaining the same with respect to the end vertebra.…”
Section: Current Study-biomechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical studies typically include assessments of load-displacement behavior of one or more functional spinal units (FSUs) under specific conditions. 8,13,21 The standard universal protocols include range of motion, stiffness, and hybrid testing. 13,21 The current study design mimics these protocols and prior PJK cadaveric studies in that specimens were unconstrained, with the magnitude and orientation of moments remaining the same with respect to the end vertebra.…”
Section: Current Study-biomechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2010 ; Gonzalez-Blohm et al. 2015 ). In these tests, it is critical to know the liver’s response to a range of factors, such as puncturing, cutting, deformations and displacements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 2 preconditioning cycles are common, 23 Stolworthy et al 22 still found "significant residual changes in segmental flexibility" and recommended 20 cycles. These findings appear consistent to the findings in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The torsion loading in each stage remained at +7.5 NÁm, as reported in comparable studies. [18][19][20]22,23 After initial testing in phase I, a pincer fracture was created in the mid-vertebra of the specimen 21 (either Th12 or L1). A wedged, V-shaped metal section ( Figure 3) was introduced laterally between the inferior endplate of the upper vertebral body and the intervertebral disc (IVD) until the IVD penetrated the superior endplate of the mid-vertebral body.…”
Section: Cyclic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%