1995
DOI: 10.1378/chest.108.5.1278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Curative Treatment by Radiotherapy Alone of Stage I Non-Small Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, survival time was in most cases inferior compared to prospective or retrospective investigations in the literature [10,16,22,23,26]. Second, we found a strikingly high number of patients who were treated with doses in the range of 50 to < 60 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…First, survival time was in most cases inferior compared to prospective or retrospective investigations in the literature [10,16,22,23,26]. Second, we found a strikingly high number of patients who were treated with doses in the range of 50 to < 60 Gy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Although some studies suggested better survival rates with increasing doses of radiation (10,14,20), others did not (7,11). Some studies showed that histologic type (22) and initial response to radiation (12) were associated with improved patient survival. None of the studies however, included an untreated control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective analyses have reported the outcomes of patients treated with RT alone but did not include a control group (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23). These studies showed that the prognosis of these patients is poor, with a 20% (range 13-39%) 5-year lung cancer-specific survival rate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have demonstrated the prognostic factors of radiotherapy for early stages, including radiation dose [14], tumor size [15], nodal status [16]. There is only one study that shows the differences in survival based on the histological subtype, however, squamous cell carcinomas are known to have better results [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%