2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(09)17813-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cultural neuroscience of person perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our formulation of cultural knowledge as rich associative webs including knowledge and procedures implies that culture should influence both mind and brainhow people think and the structures supporting these functions (for more detail, see Freeman, Rule, & Ambady, 2009;Oyserman, 2011). While the growing field of cultural neuroscience uses a contrasting frame (e.g., individualistic vs. collectivistic) to highlight neural differences (for a review, see Kitayama & Uskul, 2011), our cultural expertise formulation fits better with neural prediction models (e.g., Bar 2009;Friston, 2009;Friston & Stephan, 2007;Schultz & Dickinson, 2000).…”
Section: Making Predictions About and In The World Neural Prediction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our formulation of cultural knowledge as rich associative webs including knowledge and procedures implies that culture should influence both mind and brainhow people think and the structures supporting these functions (for more detail, see Freeman, Rule, & Ambady, 2009;Oyserman, 2011). While the growing field of cultural neuroscience uses a contrasting frame (e.g., individualistic vs. collectivistic) to highlight neural differences (for a review, see Kitayama & Uskul, 2011), our cultural expertise formulation fits better with neural prediction models (e.g., Bar 2009;Friston, 2009;Friston & Stephan, 2007;Schultz & Dickinson, 2000).…”
Section: Making Predictions About and In The World Neural Prediction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stage at which each Jordanian is at will affect his or her interpretation of both Americans in person and from secondary exposure, such as films. Culture is a determining factor both in social perception and the physiological response determining this perception (Freeman, Nicholas, and Ambady, 2009). In other words, how different cultures perceive is different: "In sum, one"s cultural background determines the engagement of a frontparietal attentional network when making basic perceptual judgments" (Kitayama, Duffy, Kawamura, and Larsen, 2003, p. 195).…”
Section: General Theory On Cross-cultural Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may cause both parties to be racist against each other or act uncharacteristically in interaction. This is particularly important to consider because seeing a group as a threat may not be consciously recognized; implicit negative feelings towards groups have been shown without the person knowing they disliked a certain group (Freeman, Nicholas, and Ambady, 2009). If Jordanians or Americans do not know they are racist towards the other, then they may judge their perceptions to be unbiased when they in fact are.…”
Section: General Theory On Cross-cultural Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies about cultural difference have shown that memory tasks can produce different results because of the different cultural backgrounds (Freeman, Rule, and Ambady 2009;Gutchess and Indeck 2009;Schwartz, Boduroglu, and Gutchess 2014). Consumers learn, encode, and retrieve product information, and how they do it affects their behavior during a purchase situation (Cowley 2002).…”
Section: Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%