1973
DOI: 10.1107/s0567740873007375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of tetranitratobis(triphenylphosphine oxide)thorium(IV)

Abstract: The crystal structure has been determined from three-dimensional X-ray data collected by photographic methods. The crystals are monoclinic, with unit-cell dimensions a= 14.081 (5), b= 17.590 (5), c= 16.567 (5) A,, fl= 91-02 (10)°; the space group is P21/n and Z= 4. The structure was solved by Patterson and Fourier methods, and refined by the least-squares method on the basis of 3933 indelzendent observations. The final value of conventional R is 0.1009. The thorium atom has a coordination number of ten involvi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While cyclometalated aryloxide ligands have been observed in a number of crystallographically characterized transition metal complexes, especially of group 5, we believe 7 to be the first example of a structurally characterized cyclometalated aryloxide ligand in f-element chemistry. The Th−O distance to the triphenylphosphine oxide ligand is 2.445(7) Å, which is comparable to the distances of 2.376(10) (av), 2.35(2) (av), and 2.36(1) Å found for the triphenylphosphine oxide ligands in ThCl 4 (OPPh 3 ) 3 , Th(NO 3 ) 4 (OPPh 3 ) 2 , and Th(NO 3 ) 2 (C 17 H 13 N 2 O 2 ) 2 (OPPh 3 ) 2 3 ORTEP representation (40% probability ellipsoids) of the molecular structure of Cp*Th(OC 6 H 3 - t -BuCMe 2 CH 2 )(OAr)(OPPh 3 ) ( 7 ) giving the atom-numbering scheme used in the tables. 4 Selected Bond Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for Cp*Th(OC 6 H 3 - t -BuCMe 2 CH 2 )(OAr)(OPPh 3 ) ( 7 ) Th(1)−C(25)2.521(12)Th(1)−O(1)2.445(7) Th(1)−O(2)2.205(7)Th(1)−O(3)2.192(6) Th(1)−Cp*(cent)2.62(1)Th(1)−Cp*(av)2.88(4) Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−O(3)168.3(3)Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−C(25)99.2(3) Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−O(2)101.4(3)Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−O(1)98.7(3) O(3)−Th(1)−C(25)70.6(3)O(3)−Th(1)−O(2)86.9(3) O(3)−Th(1)−O(1)80.5(2)O(1)−Th(1)−C(25)111.6(3) O(2)−Th(1)−C(25)104.4(3)O(1)−Th(1)−O(2)134.9(3) Th(1)−C(25)−C(26)116.8(8)Th(1)−O(1)−P(1)166.6(4) Th(1)−O(2)−C(19)162.6(6)Th(1)−O(3)−C(32)148.4(6)
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…While cyclometalated aryloxide ligands have been observed in a number of crystallographically characterized transition metal complexes, especially of group 5, we believe 7 to be the first example of a structurally characterized cyclometalated aryloxide ligand in f-element chemistry. The Th−O distance to the triphenylphosphine oxide ligand is 2.445(7) Å, which is comparable to the distances of 2.376(10) (av), 2.35(2) (av), and 2.36(1) Å found for the triphenylphosphine oxide ligands in ThCl 4 (OPPh 3 ) 3 , Th(NO 3 ) 4 (OPPh 3 ) 2 , and Th(NO 3 ) 2 (C 17 H 13 N 2 O 2 ) 2 (OPPh 3 ) 2 3 ORTEP representation (40% probability ellipsoids) of the molecular structure of Cp*Th(OC 6 H 3 - t -BuCMe 2 CH 2 )(OAr)(OPPh 3 ) ( 7 ) giving the atom-numbering scheme used in the tables. 4 Selected Bond Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) for Cp*Th(OC 6 H 3 - t -BuCMe 2 CH 2 )(OAr)(OPPh 3 ) ( 7 ) Th(1)−C(25)2.521(12)Th(1)−O(1)2.445(7) Th(1)−O(2)2.205(7)Th(1)−O(3)2.192(6) Th(1)−Cp*(cent)2.62(1)Th(1)−Cp*(av)2.88(4) Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−O(3)168.3(3)Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−C(25)99.2(3) Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−O(2)101.4(3)Cp*(cent)−Th(1)−O(1)98.7(3) O(3)−Th(1)−C(25)70.6(3)O(3)−Th(1)−O(2)86.9(3) O(3)−Th(1)−O(1)80.5(2)O(1)−Th(1)−C(25)111.6(3) O(2)−Th(1)−C(25)104.4(3)O(1)−Th(1)−O(2)134.9(3) Th(1)−C(25)−C(26)116.8(8)Th(1)−O(1)−P(1)166.6(4) Th(1)−O(2)−C(19)162.6(6)Th(1)−O(3)−C(32)148.4(6)
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For this work, the calixarene has been recalculated with the MM3 and CONFLEX procedures, and the same conformation was found, albeit with a much lower energy, 230 kJ mol −1 . The molecule of each complex was built taking into account the experimental data reported above and in the literature. ,,,, The structures refined by performing optimized geometry calculations as well as their associated thermodynamic parameters are collected in Table . The main bond lengths and bond angles of the coordination polyhedra of the thorium complexes are collected in Table S1 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiotoxicity of the actinides is a limitation in the development of their coordination chemistry. Therefore, analogue cations are often studied, for example, Eu(III) for Pu(III), Am(III), and Cm(III); Th(IV) for U(IV) and Pu(IV); and UO 2 2+ for NpO 2 2+ and PuO 2 2+ . , The most explored complexes are those of uranium and thorium. , , Coordination numbers (CN) ranging from 6 to 12 have been found for thorium(IV) complexes with neutral and charged organic ligands, ,,,, CN = 8 and 9 with square antiprismatic and trigonal prismatic geometries being the most common. Th(IV) complexes with macrocycles such as porphyrins and calixarenes are also known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several investigators have reported examples of thorium(IV) coordination numbers of 12, and factors responsible for these unexpectedly high coordination numbers have been briefly discussed. 19,21,23 It has been suggested that the packing in those structures containing nitrate ions is stabilized by short O-O nitrate oxygen atom nonbonded interactions, the thorium(IV) cation size, and the empty 5f electronic configuration. Indeed, the structure of 1 shows two nonbonded oxygen-oxygen atom distances 0(5)-0(6), 2.148 (6) Á, and 0(8)-0(9), 2.147 (7) Á, which are significantly shorter than the sum of oxygen atom ionic radii, 2.8 Á.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The short nitrate ion edge distances represent the "bite" distance in these bidentate ligands, and they are similar to distances reported for MgTh(N03)6-8H2023 and 3. 19 Lastly, the stability of the coordination number of 12 in 1 is further indicated by a comparison of potential coordination choices. In 3, the maximum coordination number available to thorium is 10 since the two phosphoryl ligands each offer only one coordination site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%