2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.03.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crystal structure of LiND2 and Mg(ND2)2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
5
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Here, it should be mentioned that the deuterium in the experimental structure found by Sørby et al is for the sake of simplicity and is referred to as hydrogen in the remainder of this article, both in the text and in the tables. When turning to the H-N-H angles, however, there was a notable spread (101-107°) in the experimental study, 21 whereas the angles found in our and Velikokhatnyi et al's 22 models were much more homogeneous (102.5-102.7°and 102.5-102.9°, respectively). All in all, the differences between our calculated and the previously published structural parameters 21,22 are small.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Here, it should be mentioned that the deuterium in the experimental structure found by Sørby et al is for the sake of simplicity and is referred to as hydrogen in the remainder of this article, both in the text and in the tables. When turning to the H-N-H angles, however, there was a notable spread (101-107°) in the experimental study, 21 whereas the angles found in our and Velikokhatnyi et al's 22 models were much more homogeneous (102.5-102.7°and 102.5-102.9°, respectively). All in all, the differences between our calculated and the previously published structural parameters 21,22 are small.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…When turning to the H-N-H angles, however, there was a notable spread (101-107°) in the experimental study, 21 whereas the angles found in our and Velikokhatnyi et al's 22 models were much more homogeneous (102.5-102.7°and 102.5-102.9°, respectively). All in all, the differences between our calculated and the previously published structural parameters 21,22 are small. The most notable difference was in the interatomic distances 24 on a number of hydrides showed that different starting points gave significant variations in the size of the calculated lattice constants when the force relaxation criterion is in the order of 0.05 eV/Å (the same as in the present study).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…82). 23,42 The conventional unit cell of LiNH 2 , with eight formula units, is illustrated in Fig. 1.…”
Section: A Structural and Electronic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of the remaining N estimated from the weight loss was around 10% larger than that expected. A deuterated sample was synthesized in a similar way as sample II, but instead LiND 2 [20] was used as a starting material and 7 MPa D 2 (Taiyo Nippon Sanso, >99.8%) for the final heat treatment. A Li-Mg-N-D intermediate phase (sample III) was prepared by heating the deuterated sample at 200 • C in vacuum for 8 h.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%