2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(99)00277-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The crush behaviour of Rohacell-51WF structural foam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
105
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the 2.5mm cell size, the shear failure stress is about 6MPa which should be compared to the compression value of 10MPa. This would indicate a failure surface typical of foams [15]. However, more unusual cellular structures may well give more unconventional failure surfaces.…”
Section: H Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the 2.5mm cell size, the shear failure stress is about 6MPa which should be compared to the compression value of 10MPa. This would indicate a failure surface typical of foams [15]. However, more unusual cellular structures may well give more unconventional failure surfaces.…”
Section: H Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter failure mode gives a more abrupt reduction in stress after failure. It would be interesting to conduct both biaxial and hydrostatic tests, as these are important for localised loadings in sandwich structures [4,15]. For the 2.5mm cell size, the shear failure stress is about 6MPa which should be compared to the compression value of 10MPa.…”
Section: H Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniaxial tension and compression test data that derived from the theoretical analysis are used as the input of model, as shown in Figure 12. Noticing that the stress-strain curve of PMI foam under uniaxial tension is treated as linear [3,23]. The maximum principal stress criteria is used to model the failure in the PMI foam core and the elements that exceed the maximum allowable principal tensile stress, which is 3.7 MPa according to the tests [26], will be removed during the simulation process.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable studies have been carried out on the failure analysis of PMI foams. Li and Mines have studied the compressive process of PMI foam under uniaxial compression [2] and the crush behavior under a series of tests [3]. Chen et al have investigated the influence of foam structure on the macroscopic properties of PMI foam [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of cellular structures have been investigated with the aim of improving understanding of compressive response and thus maximising energy absorption over a range of representative impact conditions. These include metal [3][4][5] and polymeric [6][7][8][9] foams, composites [10][11][12] and honeycombs [13][14][15]. One notable feature of this class of materials is the enhance-ment of crushing strength observed under dynamic loading due to inertial effects, as seen by Reid and Peng [16] in wood, Tan et al [17] in aluminium foams and Xue and Hutchinson [18] and Wu and Jiang [19] in metallic honeycombs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%