The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics

Abstract

Since Edward Leamer's memorable 1983 paper, “Let's Take the Con out of Econometrics,” empirical microeconomics has experienced a credibility revolution. While Leamer's suggested remedy, sensitivity analysis, has played a role in this, we argue that the primary engine driving improvement has been a focus on the quality of empirical research designs. The advantages of a good research design are perhaps most easily apparent in research using random assignment. We begin with an overview of Leamer's 1983 critique and his proposed remedies. We then turn to the key factors we see contributing to improved empirical work, including the availability of more and better data, along with advances in theoretical econometric understanding, but especially the fact that research design has moved front and center in much of empirical micro. We offer a brief digression into macroeconomics and industrial organization, where progress—by our lights—is less dramatic, although there is work in both fields that we find encouraging. Finally, we discuss the view that the design pendulum has swung too far. Critics of design-driven studies argue that in pursuit of clean and credible research designs, researchers seek good answers instead of good questions. We briefly respond to this concern, which worries us little.

Evaluating Ingenious Instruments for Fundamental Determinants of Long-Run Economic Growth and Development

“…However, exclusion restrictions "are motivated by subject matter, that is economic, rather than statistical, knowledge" (Imbens 2010, p. 403), as is evident from the review in Section 2. The most influential studies in the literature on the fundamental determinants of development (Acemoglu et al 2001(Acemoglu et al , 2002 are regarded as providing good examples of historical natural experiments generating quasi-random variation in fundamental determinants (Angrist and Pischke 2010;Fuchs-Schuendeln and Hassan 2015). Judgements on the plausibility of identification strategies rely primarily on the plausibility of their a priori theoretical arguments.…”

Key Steps in Methodology of Econometrics and Significance of Each Step in the Theory and Practice of Strategic Management.

“…The most common relationship is linear meaning that any change in the explanatory variable will have appositive correlated with the dependable variable. This is why the multiple linear regression model is the most used tool in econometric because it expresses relationship linearly [7].…”

On Minimizing the Risk of Bias in Randomized Controlled Trials in Economics

“…Within academia, the RCT is now widely considered a part of the economist's empirical toolkit (Angrist and Pischke 2010); beyond academia, RCTs are often used to determine government policy as well as guide decisions in large international organizations (Parker 2010;Council of Economic Advisors 2014).…”