2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41370-020-0225-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The COVID-19 pandemic: a moment for exposure science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these conditions, they were more likely to be exposed to viral contamination. One similar reality was evidenced in the work of Deziel, et al [33] (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…In these conditions, they were more likely to be exposed to viral contamination. One similar reality was evidenced in the work of Deziel, et al [33] (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Adapting the CDC infection control pyramid, Morawska et al and Deziel et al summarized methods to minimize indoor exposure to SARS-CoV-2 [4,14]. Their efforts recognized pathogen elimination as most effective, followed by engineering and administrative controls, with personal protective equipment (PPE) considered least effective.…”
Section: Indoor Exposure Mitigation Strategies For Sars-cov-2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimation can be easily surpassed, as people are increasingly uncertain about returning to their old shopping patterns. The greater risk of exposure in the sector due to the supply chain requirements and the design of the built environment ( Deziel et al, 2020 ) can put a halt on consumers’ return to the high street, as according to Maybe* (2020) , 47% of UK shoppers are feeling nervous to return to the shops, and 54% said that they would visit their town centres less often. Additionally, research by SpringboardMarketing (2020) (also in the UK) shows that consumers will not be willing to return to shopping if other people are not following safety measures (36%), or the retailers are not doing enough to ensure public safety (24%).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%