2020
DOI: 10.3386/w27220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cost of Privacy: Welfare Effects of the Disclosure of COVID-19 Cases

Abstract: for helpful comments. We use proprietary data from SK Telecom and thank Geovision at SK Telecom and Brian Kim for their assistance with the data. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Models of rational agents limiting contacts to reduce the risk of infection include Fenichel (2013) Weitz et al (2020) in epidemiology (see also Funk et al (2010) and Verelst et al (2016) for surveys); and Geoffard and Philipson (1996), Goenka and Liu (2012), Acemoglu et al (2020), Aguirregabiria et al (2020), Argente et al (2020), Bethune and Korinek (2020), Farboodi et al (2020), Fernandez-Villaverde and Jones (2020), Greenwood et al (2019), Keppo et al (2020), Toxvaerd (2020) (as well as several of the papers cited in Footnote 2, modeling spatial extensions of SIR) in economics. Empirically, several papers use cellular phone data to document how fear of contagion has affected mobility or show that the economy deteriorated substantially even before or independently of lockdown orders.…”
Section: State Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Models of rational agents limiting contacts to reduce the risk of infection include Fenichel (2013) Weitz et al (2020) in epidemiology (see also Funk et al (2010) and Verelst et al (2016) for surveys); and Geoffard and Philipson (1996), Goenka and Liu (2012), Acemoglu et al (2020), Aguirregabiria et al (2020), Argente et al (2020), Bethune and Korinek (2020), Farboodi et al (2020), Fernandez-Villaverde and Jones (2020), Greenwood et al (2019), Keppo et al (2020), Toxvaerd (2020) (as well as several of the papers cited in Footnote 2, modeling spatial extensions of SIR) in economics. Empirically, several papers use cellular phone data to document how fear of contagion has affected mobility or show that the economy deteriorated substantially even before or independently of lockdown orders.…”
Section: State Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a study conducted in South Korea has used a unique model of epidemiology to study the dynamics of the pandemic by using SIR model (S, susceptible; I, infectious; R, recovered). They concluded that Public information disclosure targeting SARS-CoV-2 positive cases were more effective in limiting transmission than lockdowns in the region with 50 percent lower economic losses [174]. Similarly, strict lock down and qurantine policy should be revised as there are further studies demonstrating high percentage of asymptomatic individuals.…”
Section: Asymtpomatic Transmission From Human To Human the Asymptomatic Fraction Self-limiting Course: Influenza In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has stimulated a rapidly growing body of literature on the economics of the pandemic, integrating basic epidemiological models with dynamic optimisation tools from economics (Bethune & Korinek, 2020;Dasaratha, 2020;Pindyck, 2020). In line with this recent trend, several scholars have extended the classic Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) model, which is presented as a system of ordinary differential equations (ODE), to study the interaction between economic decisions and the pandemic dynamics of the COVID-19 outbreak (Acemoglu et al, 2020;Alfaro et al, 2020;Argente et al, 2020;Bethune & Korinek, 2020;Bodenstein et al, 2020;Dasaratha, 2020;Fern andez-Villaverde & Jones, 2020;Krueger et al, 2020;Pindyck, 2020;Quaas, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%