1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01709878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cost of an intensive care unit: A prospective study

Abstract: The cost of intensive care for patients admitted to the ICU were estimated. Patients suffering from severe combined acute respiratory and renal failure who required mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy (SCARRF-D) cost per day significantly more than non-renal patients (pounds 938 compared to pounds 653 per patient respectively) and their average length of stay in hospital is nearly 4 times as long (28.8 compared to 7.6 days respectively). Approximately 44% of the total cost was staff related (2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This mortality rate and cost per patient is in keeping with previous estimates (13,25). Our study shows that CRRT costs at least $3,500 per week, largely due to supplies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This mortality rate and cost per patient is in keeping with previous estimates (13,25). Our study shows that CRRT costs at least $3,500 per week, largely due to supplies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…We have calculated an experience-based cost of CRRT and compared that to costs for IHD and APD. Others have reported on similar comparisons (1)(2)(3)(4). We hope that this information will be useful to individual dialysis centers and will initiate discussions which facilitate a more standardized approach in the future.…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Bed occupancy varies widely between countries according to the method used to calculate the length of stay in ICU, and one should be careful in interpreting it [1, 26]. As noted in a previous study, data collection for costs is very cumbersome [27] and is susceptible to errors, especially with varying interpretations of the definitions. We strove to minimise this error.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%