2015
DOI: 10.1515/geoca-2015-0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The correlation of the Neogene of Central and Eastern Paratethys segments of Ukraine with the International Stratigraphic Chart based on planktonic microfossils

Abstract: Detailed analysis of microplankton occurrence (planktonic foraminifera, nannoplankton, dinocysts) in Neogene sediments situated at the north-western and south-eastern margins of Ukraine enabled us to distinguish 10 associations of oceanic plankton which specified the relative age of lithostratigraphic units of various regions and were used as correlation levels within the Central and Eastern Paratethys strata. Moreover, an attempt to correlate regional stages and

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Maeotian transgression (Rögl, ), reconnected the Paratethys basins again putting an end to the late Miocene dry and endorheic phase in Central Eurasia. The age of the Maeotian transgression is seriously disputed with ~5 Myr age discrepancies between the different models (11.6 Ma—Moghadam, ; 10.5 Ma—Rögl, ; Maţenco, Bertotti, Cloetingh, & Dinu, ; 9.8 Ma—Semenenko, Andreeva‐Grigorovich, Maslun, & Lulieva, ; Gozhyk, Semenenko, Andreeva‐Grigorovich, & Maslun, ; 9;.5 Ma—Nevesskaya, Goncharova, Ilyina, Paramonova, & Khondkarian, ; 8.85 Ma—Andreescu, 2009; 8.6 Ma—Vasiliev et al., ; 7.6 Ma—Trubikhin, ; Radionova et al., ) and the underlying tectonic or climatic triggering mechanisms are therefore still unexplained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Maeotian transgression (Rögl, ), reconnected the Paratethys basins again putting an end to the late Miocene dry and endorheic phase in Central Eurasia. The age of the Maeotian transgression is seriously disputed with ~5 Myr age discrepancies between the different models (11.6 Ma—Moghadam, ; 10.5 Ma—Rögl, ; Maţenco, Bertotti, Cloetingh, & Dinu, ; 9.8 Ma—Semenenko, Andreeva‐Grigorovich, Maslun, & Lulieva, ; Gozhyk, Semenenko, Andreeva‐Grigorovich, & Maslun, ; 9;.5 Ma—Nevesskaya, Goncharova, Ilyina, Paramonova, & Khondkarian, ; 8.85 Ma—Andreescu, 2009; 8.6 Ma—Vasiliev et al., ; 7.6 Ma—Trubikhin, ; Radionova et al., ) and the underlying tectonic or climatic triggering mechanisms are therefore still unexplained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These as sem blages were re corded in the Subchert Mem ber, co eval with the Siedliska Con glom er ate, which crops out im medi ately be low the Chert Mem ber, a sig nif i cant ho ri zon at the base of the Menilite se ries (Menilite For ma tion of Gozhyk et al, 2015) of the Outer Carpathians. The mol lus can con tent of the basal part of the Oligocene Menilite se ries is known from the stud ies of Maximov (1961Maximov ( , 1963Maximov ( , 1987, Studencka et al (1999) and Popov et al (2009a).…”
Section: Other Early Oligocene Carpathian Bivalve Faunas Normal Marinmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Wysocka) For almost two centuries, the geological record of the Fore-Carpathian Basin has attracted geological studies (e.g., Staszic 1815; Alth 1850; Hilber 1882; Łomnicki 1897, 1898Teisseyre 1900;Nowak 1938;Pazdro 1953;Kudrin 1966;Ney et al 1974). Numerous new geological and geophysical studies, related to prospecting for hydrocarbon sources, started recently (e.g., Oszczypko 1996Krzywiec 1999;Dziadzio 2000;Porębski et al 2002;Krzywiec et al 2005Krzywiec et al , 2008Mastalerz et al 2006;Popadyuk et al 2006;Ślączka et al 2006;Pietsch et al 2010;Warchoł 2011;Lis and Wysocka 2012;Gozhyk et al 2015).…”
Section: Fore-carpathian Basin Vs Carpathian Foredeep (A Radwański mentioning
confidence: 99%