2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The convenient fiction of steady-state soil thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, the assumption of a steady-state may also be problematic for many conditions (McFadden, 2013;Phillips, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, the assumption of a steady-state may also be problematic for many conditions (McFadden, 2013;Phillips, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dixon et al, 2009;Heimsath, 2006), but the aggrading or degrading phases usually cannot be measured. Steady-state regolith or soil thickness, whereby surface removals approximately balance the production of new soil by bedrock weathering, is a common assumption of most models of hillslope and landscape evolution (Phillips, 2010). According to Phillips (2010), the assumption of steady-state conditions for soil, regolith, or weathering profile development may lead to unrealistic representations of the dynamics of pedogenesis and weathering profile evolution.…”
Section: Techniques For the Determination Of Soil Formation Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In others, soils can develop or degrade, sometimes disappearing altogether ('regolith stripping; ' Phillips 2005) and at other times involving biological activity and weathering profiles to 100 m depth (Stone and Comerford 1994). Phillips (2010) sees the concept of steady-state soil thickness (and presumably composition) as 'a convenient fiction,' i.e. not true, but occasionally useful.…”
Section: Evidence For Continental Dsi Retention From River Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the theory of steady-state thickness holds true, this implies that within an area of constant or minimally variable climate and geology, thickness should be closely related to topography, and soil taxonomical units should be formed in homogeneous large patches closely related to major topographical forms. Even now, "Gilbert's humped soil production function" has supporters (see Small et al, 1999;Anderson 2002) as well as critics, and its validity is much discussed (Gabet and Mudd, 2010;Phillips, 2010). Carson and Kirkby (1972) concluded that "Gilbert's steady-state soils" are actually metastable and the model does not operate at the landscape scale.…”
Section: P šAmonil Et Al: Disturbances Can Control Fine-scale Pedodmentioning
confidence: 99%