2002
DOI: 10.4141/s00-047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contribution of shrinkage cracks to bypass flow during simulated and natural rainfall experiments in northeastern Mexico

Abstract: . 2002. The contribution of shrinkage cracks to bypass flow during simulated and natural rainfall experiments in northeastern Mexico. Can. J. Soil Sci. 82: 65-74. Understanding the spatial and temporal dynamics of desiccation cracks and related hydro-geomorphologic processes is a key component for the sustainable management of water resources in Vertisols. The contribution of shrinkage cracks to infiltration of runoff and sediments was studied during natural and simulated rainfall experiments in Vertisols of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, if the soil again wets up above a certain threshold value, the cracks begin to shrink and eventually close, and the local infiltration capacity is then substantially reduced. This has been observed in vertisols in a catchment of northern Mexico (Navar et al, 2002), the Tannhausen catchment in Germany (Lindenmaier et al, 2006) (compare Sect. 4), and the Riesel Y-2 catchment in Texas (Allen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Shrinking and Swelling Soils Overland Flow And Infiltrationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Likewise, if the soil again wets up above a certain threshold value, the cracks begin to shrink and eventually close, and the local infiltration capacity is then substantially reduced. This has been observed in vertisols in a catchment of northern Mexico (Navar et al, 2002), the Tannhausen catchment in Germany (Lindenmaier et al, 2006) (compare Sect. 4), and the Riesel Y-2 catchment in Texas (Allen et al, 2005).…”
Section: Shrinking and Swelling Soils Overland Flow And Infiltrationsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The field results indicate that crack closure can become temporally decoupled from the bulk soil moisture. Assuming that the observed changes in crack volumes are primarily due to changes in the crack width, the temporal trends seen in Installations 1 and 2 are consistent with the results of Návar et al (2002), who measured crack dimensions during and after simulated rainfall events and observed that the majority of the cracks demonstrated significant closure during the first hour of irrigation (up to 50% decrease in width) but that complete closure did not happen for three more months (until 0.450 m of cumulative rainfall had been applied).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Surface‐based methods to monitor crack evolution include surface image analysis (Flowers and Lal, 1999; Abou Najm, 2009), observing a soil's natural foaming (Mitchell and van Genuchten, 1993), and soil surface elevation monitoring (Wells et al, 2003; Arnold et al, 2005), which can be used to estimate the evolution of the crack network by assuming isotropy of shrinkage. Examples of labor‐intensive methods include a variety of crack‐tracing techniques utilizing thin flexible metal probes for depth detection and simple geometric assumptions for volume estimation (El Abedine and Robinson, 1971; Ringrose‐Voase and Sanidad, 1996; Deeks et al, 1999; Bhushan and Sharma, 2002; Bandyopadhyay et al, 2003; Kishné et al, 2009) and calipers for measuring crack geometry (Návar et al, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, well-known errors of rainfall measurement (such as incidence angle and splash drift) are possible. Furthermore, subsurface flow between plots could occur due to vertic cracking (Návar et al, 2002). Finally, the experimental plots treated with plain tillage do not fully correspond to real-world conventional agriculture, since livestock was not allowed within the experimental station.…”
Section: Rainfall Runoff and Soil Loss At The Experimental Plotsmentioning
confidence: 99%