Threshold behaviour in hydrological systems as (human) geo-ecosystems: manifestations, controls, implications

Abstract

Abstract. In this paper we review threshold behaviour in environmental systems, which are often associated with the onset of floods, contamination and erosion events, and other degenerative processes. Key objectives of this review are to a) suggest indicators for detecting threshold behavior, b) discuss their implications for predictability, c) distinguish different forms of threshold behavior and their underlying controls, and d) hypothesise on possible reasons for why threshold behaviour might occur. Threshold behaviour involves a fast qualitative change of either a single process or the response of a system. For elementary phenomena this switch occurs when boundary conditions (e.g., energy inputs) or system states as expressed by dimensionless quantities (e.g. the Reynolds number) exceed threshold values. Mixing, water movement or depletion of thermodynamic gradients becomes much more efficient as a result. Intermittency is a very good indicator for detecting event scale threshold behavior in hydrological systems. Predictability of intermittent processes/system responses is inherently low for combinations of systems states and/or boundary conditions that push the system close to a threshold. Post hoc identification of "cause-effect relations" to explain when the system became critical is inherently difficult because of our limited ability to perform observations under controlled identical experimental conditions. In this review, we distinguish three forms of threshold behavior. The first one is threshold behavior at the Correspondence to: E. Zehe (e.zehe@bv.tum.de) process level that is controlled by the interplay of local soil characteristics and states, vegetation and the rainfall forcing. Overland flow formation, particle detachment and preferential flow are examples of this. The second form of threshold behaviour is the response of systems of intermediate complexity -e.g., catchment runoff response and sediment yield -governed by the redistribution of water and sediments in space and time. These are controlled by the topological architecture of the catchments that interacts with system states and the boundary conditions. Crossing the response thresholds means to establish connectedness of surface or subsurface flow paths to the catchment outlet. Subsurface stormflow in humid areas, overland flow and erosion in semi-arid and arid areas are examples, and explain that crossing local process thresholds is necessary but not sufficient to trigger a system response threshold. The third form of threshold behaviour involves changes in the "architecture" of human geoecosystems, which experience various disturbances. As a result substantial change in hydrological functioning of a system is induced, when the disturbances exceed the resilience of the geo-ecosystem. We present examples from savannah ecosystems, humid agricultural systems, mining activities affecting rainfall runoff in forested areas, badlands formation in Spain, and the restoration of the Upper Rhine river basin as examples of this phenomenon. This fun...

What can flux tracking teach us about water age distribution patterns and their temporal dynamics?

“…However, the full potential of such integrated conceptual models to serve as diagnostic tools (cf. McDonnell et al, 2007;Dunn et al, 2008b;Zehe and Sivapalan, 2009) was not fully realized until recently when a few studies started investigating the spatio-temporal dynamics of flow path distributions and what is controlling them (e.g. Botter et al, 2010; der Velde et al, 2012).…”

“…The pattern of flow process connectivity is largely dependent on the topological structure of a catchment (cf. Zehe and Sivapalan, 2009). However, very fast switches are reported for a wide range of catchments 5).…”

Maximum entropy production: can it be used to constrain conceptual hydrological models?

“…3142 M. C. Westhoff and E. Zehe: MEP to constrain conceptual models Schymanski et al (2009b) optimized net carbon profit under given environmental conditions. Another proposed organizing principle is the maximum entropy production principle (MEP) (McDonnell et al, 2007;Kleidon and Schymanski, 2008;Kleidon, 2009Kleidon, , 2010aZehe and Sivapalan, 2009;Schaefli et al, 2011). However, in the hydrological community it remained -so far -mainly on the visionary level.…”

The influence of soil moisture on threshold runoff generation processes in an alpine headwater catchment

“…They can occur at different levels of complexity (Zehe and Sivapalan, 2009), at various spatial scales and may limit the predictability of hydrological processes and the repeatability of hydrological observations . Therefore, investigating and understanding the controls exerted by thresholds is essential to understand stream responses at the catchment scale (Tetzlaff et al, 2008).…”