1986
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<1333:tcomcw>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Contribution of Mesoscale Convective Weather Systems to the Warm-Season Precipitation in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
239
1
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(260 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
13
239
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Various observational and modeling studies (e.g. Fritsch et al 1986;Rodgers et al 1994;Evans 1998) indicate that the rainfall signature of a convective system is modulated by its degree of organization. Thus, the relative frequency of each system type and their (spatial and temporal) distribution may have important implications for the regional hydrologic cycle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Various observational and modeling studies (e.g. Fritsch et al 1986;Rodgers et al 1994;Evans 1998) indicate that the rainfall signature of a convective system is modulated by its degree of organization. Thus, the relative frequency of each system type and their (spatial and temporal) distribution may have important implications for the regional hydrologic cycle.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…After quality control, a selection criterion (combined size and duration) was defined to keep only those systems ranging within a predefined scale. The final criterion combines aspects of the Fritsch et al (1986) and Augustine et al (1988) criteria. The MCSs that meet the following two conditions during its life cycle are kept as selected MCSs and form the dataset: (a) the size of the -52°C area must be greater than 10000 km 2 and (b) this size must be maintained for at least three hours.…”
Section: Figure 2 Territorial Units As Used In the Heavy Rain Databamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The [Stensrud, 1996] and mesoscale convective complexes [Maddox, 1980;Fritsch et al, 1986] for the periods simulated and thus conservatively assumed that differences between model output and observed behavior represent simulation errors due to factors such as construction and ingestion of boundary conditions and internal shortcomings in the models. This assumption is most reasonable for large-scale mass, temperature, and momentum fields and less so for humidity [Trenberth and Guillemot, 1995].…”
Section: Domain and Periodmentioning
confidence: 99%