The Contribution of Astragalus adsurgens Roots and Canopy to Water Erosion Control in the Water–Wind Crisscrossed Erosion Region of the Loess Plateau, China

Abstract

Simulated rainfall experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of Astragalus adsurgens roots and canopy on water erosion yield, erosion processes and soil resistance to erosion. Experiments were conducted on grass, root and bare slopes, with sandy soil from a water–wind crisscrossed erosion region of the Loess Plateau, China. A. adsurgens coverage on grass slopes was approximately 40%. There were three rainfall intensities of 30, 60 and 90 mm h–1 and four slope gradients of 3, 6, 9 and 12°. A. adsurgens had a significant effect on soil erosion control; soil loss was reduced by ~70% on slopes with the grass compared with bare slopes. The grass roots reduced soil loss more than its canopy, particularly in high‐intensity rainfall, which reduced soil loss by 82%. The presence of the grass and its roots changed the soil erosion process, reducing soil erodibility (Kr) and increasing the critical shear stress (τc). The soil erosion rate on the bare slope increased steadily over time; on the grass and root slopes, its rate initially increased, then decreased and then finally stabilized. Kr on the grass and root slopes was reduced by 96% and 89%, respectively, compared with the bare slope, while the corresponding τc increased by 92% and 195% respectively. These results provide insights into the mechanisms of grass on soil and water conservation and may help to improve vegetation construction in water–wind crisscrossed erosion regions of the Loess Plateau. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Changes in Erosion and Runoff due to Replacement of Pasture Land with Sugarcane Crops

“…With regard to erosion, the authors state that the mulch had a greater protective effect on the soil compared to the canopy, while the combined effect decreased erosion by 99% compared to the bare soil. The roots also helped to reduce soil erosion [43,44].…”

Sediment Yield Deduction from Check–dams Deposition in the Weathered Sandstone Watershed on the North Loess Plateau, China

“…Molina et al () showed that sediment yield decreased exponentially with an increasing vegetation cover in a central Andean mountain area, the lithology also influenced the catchment sediment yield significantly and explained an additional 23% of the observed variance in specific sediment yield. Grassland showed the highest values in soil quality properties, and soil loss was reduced by 70% on slopes with the grass compared with bare slopes in water–wind crisscrossed erosion regions of the Loess Plateau (Zhao et al , ; Zhao et al , ). The land use changes alone reduced sediment yield up to 14%, but in combination with check dams, the reduction in sediment yield reached 44 ± 6% in southeast of Spain (Quiñonero‐Rubio et al , ).…”

Impacts of different vegetation restoration options on gully head soil resistance and soil erosion in loess tablelands

“…Vegetation restoration improves soil resistance to concentrated flow erosion mainly through the combined effects of root system and soil properties (Zhou and Shangguan, 2008;Zhang et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2016). In terms of root system, plant roots can enhance the soil structure, soil shear strength, and soil infiltration capacity and thus improve soil resistance to flow erosion (Gyssels and Poesen, 2003;De Baets et al, 2006Vannoppen et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2015).…”