1992
DOI: 10.1017/s1446788700034340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The continuity of derivations from group algebras: factorizable and connected groups

Abstract: A group is said to be factorizable if it has a finite number of abelian subgroups, H1, H2, … Hn, such that G = H1H2 … Hn. It is shown that, if G is a factorizable or connected locally compact group, then every derivation from L1 (G) to an arbitrary L1 (G)-bimodule X is continuous.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step 1 shows that a certain ideal, called the continuity ideal, has ®nite codimension in the algebra, and Step 2 uses an approximate identity argument to show that the restriction of the derivation to the continuity ideal is continuous. This approach does succeed in showing that all derivations from C Ã -algebras are continuous, [23], and is used in [37] to show that derivations from L 1 G are continuous for certain groups G. In the case of general locally compact groups, Corollary 6.2 would suf®ce to carry out Step 2 if Step 1 could be completed. However our current understanding of the structure of general group algebras seems inadequate for this.…”
Section: Automatic Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Step 1 shows that a certain ideal, called the continuity ideal, has ®nite codimension in the algebra, and Step 2 uses an approximate identity argument to show that the restriction of the derivation to the continuity ideal is continuous. This approach does succeed in showing that all derivations from C Ã -algebras are continuous, [23], and is used in [37] to show that derivations from L 1 G are continuous for certain groups G. In the case of general locally compact groups, Corollary 6.2 would suf®ce to carry out Step 2 if Step 1 could be completed. However our current understanding of the structure of general group algebras seems inadequate for this.…”
Section: Automatic Continuitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural question to ask is as follows: which ideals in L 1 G may be decomposed as in the Main Theorem? It is shown in [37] that, if G is discrete or connected and N is a closed normal subgroup, then the ideal has such a decomposition. It can be shown that a necessary condition for I to have such a decomposition is that I should be weakly complemented.…”
Section: Extension To Other Idealsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again using [Joh,Corollary 4.5], we may therefore assume that G is a connected Lie group. Now, by [Wil,Theorem 1.2], there are abelian subgroups Hx, ... ,Hn of G such that G = Hi ■ ■ ■ H" . Hence, as a consequence of [Joh,Theorem 4.2(a) If "irreducible representation" is supposed here to mean "topologically irreducible ""-representation on a Hubert space", as is usual in the group algebra context, this question asks if every G £ [Moore] is WCHP and is thus resolved by our theorem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 2 )^( 3 )^ ( 7 ) (*) II V (2) is shown by an example of Paschke (see [19] or [9,Example 22.3]). Also, the algebras treated in [23], which have already been mentioned, do not satisfy (2) but they do satisfy (7). It is not known whether they satisfy (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%