2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11077-012-9163-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India

Abstract: The policy literature has long recognized the inherent need for a program to fit the unique conditions found in a certain context. We present a theory of institutional contextualism that focuses on the mechanisms by which actors adapt a policy design to fit a situation. We conceptualize institutions as phenomena that are constituted by a constant dialectic between text (the general blueprint) and context (the particular setting). The first half of this dialectic, which is the diffusion of the constitutive text… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Policy formulation typically occurs within the confines of an existing governance mode and policy logic which simplifies the task of policy design by restricting the number of alternatives which are considered feasible in any given planning situation, reducing to manageable proportions the otherwise almost infinite range of possible specific micro-level instrument choices (Meuleman 2009a, b). However, the new design orientation notes how this requires designers to be capable of making a match between text and context (Lejano and Shankar 2013) and diagnosing accurately whatever contextual constraints and opportunities may exist within a design space (Considine 2012).…”
Section: How Do Designs Evolve? From Replacement To Layeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy formulation typically occurs within the confines of an existing governance mode and policy logic which simplifies the task of policy design by restricting the number of alternatives which are considered feasible in any given planning situation, reducing to manageable proportions the otherwise almost infinite range of possible specific micro-level instrument choices (Meuleman 2009a, b). However, the new design orientation notes how this requires designers to be capable of making a match between text and context (Lejano and Shankar 2013) and diagnosing accurately whatever contextual constraints and opportunities may exist within a design space (Considine 2012).…”
Section: How Do Designs Evolve? From Replacement To Layeringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe the necessity of matching problem definitions and institutional context, I borrow the term 'institutional fit' from Lejano & Shankar (2013). In their theory of institutional contextualism, the authors highlight problems that arise when a generic blueprint of an institutional structure is applied to a local context without accounting for the specific conditions of that context.…”
Section: Problem Definition and Institutional Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, reconciliation of institutional design and the specificity of a policy context remains a challenge (Brugnach and Ingram, 2012;Lejano and Shankar, 2013). With the growing homogeneity promoted by policy models spreading across the globe, calls for contextual relevance acquire ever-greater urgency and importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%