1977
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1977.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The consequences of using inadequate testers in the simplified triple test-cross

Abstract: SUMMARYThe genetieal consequences of common alleles in the L1 and L5 testers of a simplified version of the triple test-cross which is applicable to populations of inbred lines are examined. The test for epistasis under these circnsnstances becomes ambiguous and can spuriously detect non-allelie interactions when they may not exist although it still provides a test for epistasis and the adequacy of the testers simultaneously. The tests of significance and the estimates of additive variation are biased to an ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diallel crosses and selfs were produced during 1954 and the experiment conducted during 1955 by Dr E. L. Breese. Experimental details and results from this diallel have already been published in one form or another by Jinks, Perkins and Breese (1969), Virk and Jinks (1977) and Pooni, Jinks and Singh (1984).…”
Section: Experiments and Results (I) Predicted Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The diallel crosses and selfs were produced during 1954 and the experiment conducted during 1955 by Dr E. L. Breese. Experimental details and results from this diallel have already been published in one form or another by Jinks, Perkins and Breese (1969), Virk and Jinks (1977) and Pooni, Jinks and Singh (1984).…”
Section: Experiments and Results (I) Predicted Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The non-significant trait, pods per cluster in the kharif season, was not analyzed further because the L 1 and L 2 testers were inadequate, probably due to the presence of common loci for this trait. The genetical consequences of common alleles in the L 1 and L 2 testers provide an ambiguous test for epistasis and can spuriously detect non-allelic interactions when they may not be present (Virk and Jinks 1977).…”
Section: Analysis Of Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arrays that we chose from the diallel are those of varieties 1R8 and 1R29 which had the highest (27.26 per cent) and the lowest (0 per cent) amylose contents among the seven lines. These varieties were chosen to maximize genetic diversity in the testers and to avoid gene fixation which can affect the efficiency of the analysis adversely (Virk & Jinks, 1977).…”
Section: Materials and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%