2002
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.52.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic Architecture of Secondary Yield Components in Mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek).

Abstract: Triple Test Cross (TTC) analyses were carried out to detect epistasis, and to estimate additive and dominance components of genetic variation in two seasons (kharif and spring/summer) for branches per plant, pod clusters per plant, pods per cluster, pod length, biomass, and harvest index in mungbean. The results revealed the absence of epistasis for all the traits in the kharif season but in contrast the presence of epistasis for pod clusters per plant and biomass in the spring/summer season. The partitioning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The environment could fluctuate the plant height and its degree of indeterminations but with nominal impact. Genotypic × environmental interaction and its involvement in the inheritance were also reported by Deswal et al (1996) in wheat and Khattak et al (2002a) in mungbean. Additive genetic variance played a vital role in the inheritance of investigated traits, might be due to high narrow sense heritability (hF22 and hF2) estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The environment could fluctuate the plant height and its degree of indeterminations but with nominal impact. Genotypic × environmental interaction and its involvement in the inheritance were also reported by Deswal et al (1996) in wheat and Khattak et al (2002a) in mungbean. Additive genetic variance played a vital role in the inheritance of investigated traits, might be due to high narrow sense heritability (hF22 and hF2) estimates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Perkins and Jinks (1971) stated, for plant height in tobacco, that i type epistasis (additive x additive) is more sensitive to environmental effects than j type epistasis (additive x dominant). Variations in the pattern of epistasis x environment interaction between different traits were also reported by Khattak et al (2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The occurrence of epistasis for GY using the TTC or Modified TTC designs has been reported for other species, e.g., wheat (Ketata et al 1976, Singh 1981, maize (Wolf andHallauer 1997, Parvez et al 2006), mung bean (Khattak et al 2001, Khattak et al 2002, cotton (Silva andAlves 1983, Bhatti et al 2006), peanut (Upadhyaya and Nigam 1999), rice (Saleem et al 2005, Subbsaraman andRanagasamy 1989), flax (Sood et al 2007), common bean (Moreto et al 2012), soybean (Barona et al 2009), and Arabidopsis thaliana (Kusterer et al 2007). Interestingly, most of these studies were published in recent years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It was observed that inheritance and genes were in repulsion phase for SYPP; therefore, selection should be delayed to later generations under both regimes. The additive, dominance and nonallelic interaction have also been reported for these traits in mungbean (Khattak, Ashraf, & Zamir, 2004;Khattak, Haq, Ashraf, Jabbar, & Zamir, 2002;Ram, 1997;Singh & Singh, 1996). PL showed similar behaviour under both field conditions with respect to genetic components, and it was controlled by both additive and nonadditive gene effects; therefore, selection should be delayed to later generations under both regimes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%