2008
DOI: 10.1175/2007bams2520.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Consequences of Not Knowing Low- and High-Latitude Climate Sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The temperature gradient is strengthened at upper levels and weakened at lower levels, though the spread between models is still very large due to uncertainty over the temperature in both the tropical and polar regions (Rind 2008). In general, the AR4 models predict that the storm tracks will shift polewards in the future, in line with the change in the jet streams (Yin 2005).…”
Section: (B) Storm Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature gradient is strengthened at upper levels and weakened at lower levels, though the spread between models is still very large due to uncertainty over the temperature in both the tropical and polar regions (Rind 2008). In general, the AR4 models predict that the storm tracks will shift polewards in the future, in line with the change in the jet streams (Yin 2005).…”
Section: (B) Storm Tracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the long-term projections described above, there is a wellknown conflict which limits the change in midlatitude circulation; in the lower troposphere the meridional temperature gradient decreases due to amplified Arctic warming, while in the upper troposphere it increases due to amplified tropical warming [38]. In recent years, the rapid Arctic warming has been conspicuous against the backdrop of the hiatus in global mean warming.…”
Section: Amplified Arctic Warming and Emerging Changes? Recent Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with weather forecasting where such an approach yields better results (e.g. Krishnamurti et al 2000), because according to Rind (2008), the model response here is dominated by atmospheric dynamics. Thus, errors in numerical weather prediction models, that are solving the same dynamical equations, are bound to be minimised when averaged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, Rind (2008) doubts that uncertainties in climate model responses, which are largely due to different model physics, will be reduced by a multi-model approach. Different physical parameterisations imply solving different equations and "averaging different formulations" may not produce an improved result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%