2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2007.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The connection between metal ion affinity and ligand affinity in integrin I domains

Abstract: Integrins are cell-surface heterodimeric proteins that mediate cell-cell, cell-matrix, and cell-pathogen interactions. Half of the known integrin alpha subunits contain inserted domains (I domains) that coordinate ligand through a metal ion. Although the importance of conformational changes within isolated I domains in regulating ligand binding has been reported, the relationship between metal ion binding affinity and ligand binding affinity has not been elucidated. Metal and ligand binding by several I domain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
19
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(67 reference statements)
4
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In SPR experiments these ligands bind the α X I domain with remarkably similar binding kinetics, but differ considerably in apparent binding stoichiometry. This is a type of ligand recognition unlike what has been reported for the highly similar α L β 2 and α M β 2 integrins and their ligands [18,22,49,50]. Nor is this type of recognition similar to what was reported for other integrins, which bind specific, non-repeated motifs in OPN.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 37%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In SPR experiments these ligands bind the α X I domain with remarkably similar binding kinetics, but differ considerably in apparent binding stoichiometry. This is a type of ligand recognition unlike what has been reported for the highly similar α L β 2 and α M β 2 integrins and their ligands [18,22,49,50]. Nor is this type of recognition similar to what was reported for other integrins, which bind specific, non-repeated motifs in OPN.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 37%
“…While this influence of Mn 2+ involves the beta-chain I-like domain [53], we cannot exclude, however, the possibility that Mn 2+ also bind in the α X I domain MIDAS. Evidence from the wild-type α L and α M I domains suggests that Mn 2+ ions bind~5-15 fold stronger than the physiologically relevant Mg 2+ ions [50,54], but it is not clear if this alters in any way the ligand interaction by the I domain. As demonstrated by the lack of binding to HCM in these experiments compared to the robust binding to OPN, however, the Mn 2+ -activated α X β 2 integrins are capable of discriminating between ligands and non-ligands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D7 binds to the N terminus of the I-domain (residues 118 -153), which encompasses most of the metal ion-dependent adhesion site-coordinating residues. Changes in the metal ion-dependent adhesion site that accompany activation may result in an effective conformation-sensitive epitope for LFA-1 (48). Thus, the epitope of 2D7 is conformation-sensitive, and the binding is abolished when LFA-1 is locked in the high affinity conformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The monovalent interaction between CD11a/CD18 and ICAM-1 has been investigated in many studies through application of the ligand binding I domain of CD11a/CD18 mutated to assume the high-affinity conformation. Several strategies for stabilizing this high-affinity conformation reported K D values for the interaction of 200 nM (62,63) in a mode of binding consistent with a 1:1 stoichiometry (64), as expected from structural studies of the binding (63). However, the high affinity of the sCD11/CD18 complexes for ICAM-1 in our assays exceed the affinity of the monovalent interaction with as much as 10 8 -fold using the halfmaximum saturating concentration of sCD11/CD18 as an approximation of the K D for the interaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the presence of more than one ligand binding domain in the complexes likely supports avidity binding to immobilized ICAM-1. With the monovalent affinity (62,63) of the CD11a chain I domain for ICAM-1 the dissociation constant for avidity binding for a 23(CD11a/ CD18) complex would be in the order of 10 214 M, clearly on a scale that would support significant fractional coverage of ICAM-1 ligand binding sites with the plasma dilutions used. A recent report indicated that activated MMP-9 is important in the shedding of CD11a/CD18 from a murine macrophage cell line (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%