The conditions of exposure and immediacy: Internet surveillance and Generation Y

Abstract

Surveillance through information and communication technologies is an integral part of modernity. However, there has been little research into how surveillance is experienced, with much research focusing on the structural aspects of surveillance. We conducted focus groups with Generation Y internet users to investigate their experiences of internet surveillance. They demonstrate an awareness of and ambivalence about surveillance online, negotiating their digital visibility and exposure against the risks and benefits of using the internet. However, their overwhelming interest and concern is that their online access to desired content is immediate and unfettered. We argue that immediacy has come to dominate how Generation Y understand and negotiate their internet experience, and describe how immediacy outweighs any concerns participants have. This study highlights the need to further explore the experience of surveillance, and the importance of immediacy in understanding sociotechnical systems and experiences.

Conspicuous practice: self-surveillance and commodification in English education

“…Firstly there is vertical surveillance. Here there is the traditional means of downwards surveillance in the form of classroom observations and outcomes data analysis but also more recently by means of learning walks, CCTV and organizational designs such as schools-within-schools (Lee and Ready, 2007) that render individual performance more discernable. Yet vertical surveillance is not only top down.…”

<em>Diversions</em>: Obstacles for Undergraduate Students when Applying for Internship Positions Online

“…When studying surveillance through ICTs, Reference [53] highlighted that immediacy has come to govern how Millennials understand and negotiate their internet experience, outweighing any other concerns the participants could have had. Although there has been an expansion of online recruitment with the multiplication of specialized websites [2], the interviewees showed little interest in them.…”

Integrating subjects: Linking surveillance experiences to social patterns using Ethno‐Epistemic Assemblages

“…This has expanded to include surveillance opportunities facilitated through mobile technologies and devices (Caushaj et al 2013), drones and unmanned vehicles (Wall and Monahan 2011), and consumer level personal surveillance devices (Humphreys 2011). These forms of surveillance require significant resources, and thus surveillance is often thought of as being instituted by state authorities (see Lee and Cook 2015). In 2015, these concerns are continuing following information disclosed by WikiLeaks and Edward Snowden.…”