2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-004-0226-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The concentration of phenolics in brown-rot decay resistant and susceptible Scots pine heartwood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
1
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
48
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown in Figure IIIa, the decay rates of samples with very different PS + PSM levels can overlap. This supports the suggestion that the activity of the fungus is not regulated only by stilbenes [14,26]. The results of this study do not provide very much information about the mechanism through which PS and PSM slow down the degradation processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, as shown in Figure IIIa, the decay rates of samples with very different PS + PSM levels can overlap. This supports the suggestion that the activity of the fungus is not regulated only by stilbenes [14,26]. The results of this study do not provide very much information about the mechanism through which PS and PSM slow down the degradation processes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…3e). There are a few earlier reports on the ability of phenolics to interfere with the penetration of water inside Scots pine wood [1,26,28]. The reason for this relationship does not necessarily have to be related to the chemical nature of phenolic compounds, but it could also be a specific feature in the structure of the wood that is correlated with the concentration of phenolics and the absorption of water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently a solid study on the concentration of phenolics in brown-rot decay resistant and susceptible Scots pine heartwood discussed the contribution of stilbenes to the differences in the decay rate of natural wood substrate. The results showed that the stilbenes alone do not explain the variation in decay rate [18].…”
Section: Stilbenesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although cellulose is the determining component of the cell wall for water sorption [19], other variations in the amorphous components of the wood (hemicelluloses and lignin) and volatile components may have contributed both to the lower crystallisation coefficient of the old wood and to an increase in its hygroscopicity. In terms of the volatile components such as polyphenols, a high concentration of these contributes to low wood hygroscopicity [36], while the influence of the alcohol-benzene extractives has an uncertain influence on the hygroscopicity [40]. Perhaps a natural depolymerisation of the hemicelluloses, similar to that produced by high temperatures [27], and the appearance of new regions of accessible OH groups similar to those produced artificially by chemical reaction with organosilicon compounds [30] contribute to the increase in the hygroscopicity of the old wood after centuries of natural ageing.…”
Section: H Emc a Emc D ---------------=mentioning
confidence: 99%