2018
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative: Effects On Spending, Quality, Patients, And Physicians

Abstract: The Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPC), a health care delivery model developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), tested whether multipayer support of 502 primary care practices across the country would improve primary care delivery, improve care quality, or reduce spending. We evaluated the initiative's effects on care delivery and outcomes for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries attributed to initiative practices, relative to those attributed to matched comparison practices.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
103
1
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
103
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the USA, the CPC initiative has key characteristics in common with the Dutch care group approach. Our findings show a greater increase in monitoring than found in the evaluation of the first year CPC24–26 which detected only small improvements in monitoring. This difference might be explained by the recent introduction of the CPC programme, since an in-depth evaluation of US practices participating in the CPC programme revealed that practice staff appreciated advice adjusted to their job roles and practice organisation, and the electronic health record system and other digital systems used in their practice27—indicating that a quality transition had been initiated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In the USA, the CPC initiative has key characteristics in common with the Dutch care group approach. Our findings show a greater increase in monitoring than found in the evaluation of the first year CPC24–26 which detected only small improvements in monitoring. This difference might be explained by the recent introduction of the CPC programme, since an in-depth evaluation of US practices participating in the CPC programme revealed that practice staff appreciated advice adjusted to their job roles and practice organisation, and the electronic health record system and other digital systems used in their practice27—indicating that a quality transition had been initiated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Recent studies report that although transformation of practices creates additional work-including team building, data collection, reporting, and management-this work does not contribute to burnout. [14][15][16] Data on patient and family engagement were included in the dashboard to highlight essential elements to success in developing therapeutic relationships with patients. Although patient and family advisory boards were not popular because of staffing challenges and time requirements, all practices were likely to include patient feedback in operations using patient portals, direct feedback, comment cards, and suggestion boxes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While improvements have been noted in terms of access, delivery of care to high-risk populations and decreased emergency department visits, the program is currently slated to end in 2019. 9 CPCP provides one possible transition path for clinics and systems, such as those involved in CPC+, that have begun a transition away from FFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%