2019
DOI: 10.22454/fammed.2019.286478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development, Value, and Implications of a Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator for Family Medicine

Abstract: Background and Objectives: Fee for service (FFS), the dominant payment model for primary care in the United States, compensates physicians based on volume. There are many initiatives exploring alternative payment models that prioritize value over volume. The Family Medicine for America’s Health (FMAHealth) Payment Team has developed a comprehensive primary care payment (CPCP) model to support the move from activity- and volume-based payment to performance-based payment for value. Methods: In 2016-2017, the FMA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Payment Tactic Team of Family Medicine for America's Health, an initiative of several family medicine organizations, developed a comprehensive primary care payment calculator that can be used as a starting point for estimating PMPMs for a practice. 31 The calculator builds on the evidence detailed in this brief with added adjustments for quality, efficiency, and infrastructure, with 5 total components: 32 1. Base rate, intended to approximate 10% to 15% of the total cost of care and using the primary care activity levels model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Payment Tactic Team of Family Medicine for America's Health, an initiative of several family medicine organizations, developed a comprehensive primary care payment calculator that can be used as a starting point for estimating PMPMs for a practice. 31 The calculator builds on the evidence detailed in this brief with added adjustments for quality, efficiency, and infrastructure, with 5 total components: 32 1. Base rate, intended to approximate 10% to 15% of the total cost of care and using the primary care activity levels model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Practice Team collaborated with FMAHealth's Payment Team to identify and define the services that should be included in comprehensive care and to show the cost of those services for any geographically-defined population. This work is described in greater detail by The Payment Team (see "Development, Value, and Implications of a Comprehensive Primary Care Payment Calculator for Family Medicine" by Aaron George, DO, et al, in this issue 22 ). Such tools make it possible to determine the proper payment for primary care services and to allow for prospective, periodic payments requiring few administrative strings.…”
Section: Collaboration Between the Fmahealth Practice And Payment Teamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their work addresses research capacity, [12][13][14][15] workforce goals, [16][17][18][19][20] and new models of clinical care. [21][22][23][24][25][26] These articles are a sample of the work that has taken place over the course of FMAHealth. There is much to be proud of here.…”
Section: From the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%