The comprehending teacher: scaffolding in content and language integrated learning (CLIL)

Abstract

Teaching through a second language (L2) poses many challenges, as second language learners (SLLs) have fewer linguistic resources in the language of instruction. Scaffolding students' learning is a possible way of overcoming these challenges, but there are few studies on this in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) contexts. The present study suggests a framework for how to empirically identify and classify scaffolding. Using the framework, the study investigates how three Norwegian CLIL teachers support learning for second language learners (SLL) through scaffolding. Twelve lessons (science, geography and social science) were filmed in one 11th-grade CLIL class. A coding manual (PLATO) was used to identify the scaffolding strategies the teachers used. The findings indicate that CLIL teachers scaffold their students to comprehend material. However, they provide few strategies to help students solve tasks, such as modelling and strategy use. CLIL teachers scaffold differently in the natural and social sciences; the natural science teaching has more visual aids, whereas the social science teachers allows for more student talk. The results imply that natural and social science teacher complement each other. However, CLIL teachers need to create more specific learning activities to provide their students with more support. KEYWORDSContent and language integrated learning (CLIL); English as a foreign language (EFL); scaffolding; classroombased research; teacher education

Teacher ideologies of English in 21st century Norway and new directions for locally tailored ELT

“…Despite a long foreign language tradition for English education ( Simensen, 1999 ), in the early 2000s, learning English increasingly came to be viewed as resembling first language (L1) learning and as L2 learning in school ( Simensen, 2003 , 2005 ). Research suggests that, despite a predominantly functional view of English, tensions exist among: a) English for developing literacy (Hellekjær, 2008) and learning content ( Mahan, 2020 ; Mahan et al., 2018 ), b) English for more situated use ( Chvala, 2012 , Chvala, 2018 ; Rødnes, Hellekjær, & Vold, 2014 ), and c) English as a lingua franca (ELF) as a less legitimate and “hybrid” form ( Hild, 2018 ). An exploration of learners’ sociolinguistic practices in school have revealed underlying ideological tensions and exposed the need for more research on the meaning of “English” in a Norwegian school context ( Rindal, 2014 ).…”

Online Collaborative Writing via Google Docs: Case Studies in the EFL Classroom

“…To some scholars (e.g., Hammond & Gibbon, 2005;Prichard & Woollard, 2010;Van Lier, 2004), scaffolding is a means of assistance granted by someone who can support or assist in the process of acquiring knowledge and enhancing the learning experience. Scaffolding is perceived to be "a form of support for the development and learning of young learners" (Rasmussen, 2001, p.570) in knowledge building with the assistance of teachers or peers who provide essential tools to enhance the learning experience (Mahan, 2020). According to Hanjani and Li (2014), learners in small groups use scaffolding negotiations to support their peers while co-constructing texts.…”

Research into practice: CLIL in South America

“…4.1 Teacher-made CLIL materials in action CLIL authors (e.g., Ball et al, 2015;Pimentel Siqueira et al, 2018) agree that one of the obstacles for successful CLIL provision, whatever the model, is the lack of appropriate materials as scaffolding tools (Mahan, 2020). Since CLIL entails connections between the L1 and the L2 curricula, global coursebooks could not cater for every school's needs.…”