The Competing Influence of Policy Content and Political Cues: Cross-Border Evidence from the United States and Canada

Abstract

When individuals evaluate policies, they consider both the policy’s content and its endorsers. In this study, we investigate the conditions under which these sometimes competing factors guide preferences. In an effort to combat the spread of COVID-19, American President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau bilaterally agreed to close their shared border to refugee claimants and asylum seekers. These ideologically opposed leaders endorsing a common policy allows us to test the influence of a well-known foreign neighbor on domestic policy evaluations. With a large cross-national survey experiment, we first find that Canadians and Americans follow ideological positions in evaluating the policy, with right-leaning respondents offering the most support. With an experiment, we reveal how both populations shift their views when told about their neighboring leader’s endorsement. Our findings highlight ideologically motivated reasoning across an international border, with broad implications for understanding how individuals weigh a policy’s content against its political cues.

Pandemic Populism: Explaining Support for the People's Party of Canada in the 2021 Federal Election

“…Respondents clicking on a link titled “Take the Survey” were then directed to the post-election survey. This sampling method yields demographically representative samples that have been used in previous studies of consumer behaviour, political behaviour and public opinion in Canada and other Western democracies (Gravelle, 2021; Gravelle et al, 2022; Williams et al, 2022). The extended time period of survey data collection also allowed for an unusually large sample of 27,720, including 20,835 self-reported voters.…”

Understanding Public Support for Policies Aimed at Gender Parity in Politics: A Cross-National Experimental Study

“…SurveyMonkey's methodology yields large, demographically representative samples 2 . Samples obtained using this methodology have been used extensively to study voting behaviour and social and political attitudes (Carson et al, 2023; Chen et al, 2019; Gravelle et al, 2022; Medeiros and Gravelle, 2023; Williams et al, 2022). Descriptive statistics for our samples appear in Table A1 in the online appendix.…”

Position, salience and rhetoric: the strategic tools employed by the main Scottish political parties in the post-devolution era

“…Existing research has shown that, particularly for low information voters, what has been described as policy cues (Rabinowitz and Stuart 1989, pp. 94-95) are an important part of the process by which voters make decisions about which parties or candidates to support (Vössing et al 2021;Williams et al 2022).…”