2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2842313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Competence of the EU to Create a Neighbouring Right for Publishers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ECJ also recognizes that the likely development of diverging national measures can be a valid reason to intervene. What matters in this regard is what 'the effect of those different -present or future -national laws [is], and whether intra-EU trade represents a relatively large part of the market for the particular product at stake' (Ramalho 2016).…”
Section: A Proportio-nate Regula-tory Inter-vention?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ECJ also recognizes that the likely development of diverging national measures can be a valid reason to intervene. What matters in this regard is what 'the effect of those different -present or future -national laws [is], and whether intra-EU trade represents a relatively large part of the market for the particular product at stake' (Ramalho 2016).…”
Section: A Proportio-nate Regula-tory Inter-vention?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most far-reaching critique of the PIP proposal is that the internal market need which it claims to address does not in fact exist (Ramalho 2016). The proposed PIP is a direct follow-on to the German and Spanish provisions that introduced authorization requirements (Germany) and payment duties (Spain) for amongst others search engines and aggregator sites that list more than naked URLs (and a few words in the case of the German provision) pointing to the content put online by publishers.…”
Section: A Proportio-nate Regula-tory Inter-vention?mentioning
confidence: 99%