2016
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-016-0646-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparisons of phenotype and genotype between CADASIL and CADASIL-like patients and population-specific evaluation of CADASIL scale in China

Abstract: BackgroundCerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common form of hereditary stroke disorder caused by mutations in the NOTCH3 gene. Although CADASIL scale is a widely used tool to screen clinically suspected CADASIL patients, the differential effects of this scale in various populations remain unknown.Methods92 CADASIL-like patients and 24 CADASIL patients were selected based on CADASIL scale and gene tests. The clinical, genetic and radi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been some previous attempts of identifying specific clinical and neuroradiological features distinguishing NOTCH3 positive from negative patients. These studies, showed that several MRI characteristics, such as temporal lobe lesions, external capsule lacunes, severe WMHs as well as the family history, were more frequent in positive patients [9,[18][19][20][21][22]. Some specific algorithms supporting the identification of clinically suspected CADASIL have been proposed so far but the reliability is still debated since in most cases they were elaborated from heterogeneous and retrospectively collected populations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been some previous attempts of identifying specific clinical and neuroradiological features distinguishing NOTCH3 positive from negative patients. These studies, showed that several MRI characteristics, such as temporal lobe lesions, external capsule lacunes, severe WMHs as well as the family history, were more frequent in positive patients [9,[18][19][20][21][22]. Some specific algorithms supporting the identification of clinically suspected CADASIL have been proposed so far but the reliability is still debated since in most cases they were elaborated from heterogeneous and retrospectively collected populations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the homozygous NOTCH3 c.1759C > T (p.R587C) mutation has not been reported before, though the heterozygous cases were discussed in previous studies [15,18,19]. Whether homozygous NOTCH3 mutations are associated with much more severe phenotypes in patients with CADASIL remains to be controversial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, previous work by Markus et al tested the sensitivity of single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis for detecting NOTCH3 mutations, with an effective success rate of 80 to 85 % [14]. More recently, He et al reported that varying and population-dependant results in the effectiveness of using the pre-genetic “CADASIL scale” screening tool which evaluates clinical presentations and neuroimaging data in an effort to minimise NOTCH3 gene testing [15, 16]. As such, current diagnosis relies on the screening of all exons by sequencing to identify mutations in NOTCH3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this study, patient C-3 was found to carry non-cysteine NOTCH3 gene variants (p.S496L and p.A1020P). As yet, a comparison of the effect of these two non-cysteine variants on the pathogenic mechanisms of CADASIL or CADASIL-like phenotype [16] to a single non-cysteine variant on disease pathogenesis has not been functionally tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%