The comparison of the Behavioral Observation System and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale—Expanded

Mogge, Neil L.; LePage, James P.; Ben, Kevin Del; Murphy, James M.

doi:10.1002/jclp.2004

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The subscales of the measure have been shown to have discriminant validity from suicidal ideation ( r = .11 to .42; Taylor, Gooding, et al, 2010). The subscales of the measure have also been shown to have convergent validity with the relevant subscales of the Behavior Observation System, an observational measure of psychopathological behaviors (Mogge, LePage, Del Ben, & Murphy, 2002). Within the present study, the measure also demonstrated adequate internal consistency among a sample of individuals who were experiencing symptoms of psychosis (α = .72).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES).

Griffiths

Wood

Maltby

et al. 2015

Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Previous research has suggested that defeat (conceptualized as a failed social struggle) and entrapment (conceptualized as a perceived inability to escape from aversive situations) form a single construct that reliably predicts psychopathological outcomes in clinical and community settings. However, scales designed to assess defeat and entrapment measure the constructs separately, whereas recent evidence suggests a single scale would be appropriate. Existing scales may also be too lengthy to have clinical utility. The present study developed and evaluated a scale that measured both defeat and entrapment. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that defeat and entrapment were best defined by a single factor, and 8 items were selected that best represented this construct to form the short scale. The scale had high internal consistency (α = .88 to .94), showed criterion validity with hopelessness (r = .45 to .93) and incremental validity for caregiver burden when controlling for depression and positive symptoms of psychosis when controlling for hopelessness (β = .45 to .60). Additionally, the scale had excellent test-retest reliability using single measures absolute agreement intraclass correlation coefficients across 12 months (ricc = .88 to .92) within 4 samples: people with posttraumatic stress disorder, people with psychosis, care home employees, and people from community settings. The scale demonstrated known group validity through discrimination between clinical and nonclinical groups of participants. This scale could be implemented within therapeutic settings to help clinicians identify patients experiencing defeat and entrapment, and incorporate these factors into their clinical assessment and case formulations for treatment.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES).

Griffiths

Wood

Maltby

et al. 2015

Psychological Assessment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Initial studies found interrater reliabilities above .82 for each scale and Cronbach's alpha were all above .85 (LePage & Mogge, 2001). The validity of this instrument has been supported in studies comparing it with psychiatrist-assigned diagnoses (LePage & Mogge, 2001), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Extended version (BPRS-E) (Mogge, LePage, Del Ben, & Murphy, 2002), nurse's ratings of patients , and self-report measures of depression (LePage & Mogge, Sellers, & Del Ben, 2003).…”

mentioning

confidence: 92%

A comparison of the behavioral observation system (BOS) with clinician ratings of psychosis and mania

Lewis-Smithson

Mogge

LePage³

2009

J Clin Psychol

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the relationship of the behavioral observation system (BOS; LePage & Mogge, 2001) and clinician ratings of psychosis and mania. Fifty interviews with psychiatric inpatients using the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and the Young Mania Rating scale were completed. Paraprofessionals completed a BOS on the patient during the same day of the clinician's interview. The results of the study demonstrate the convergent validity of the BOS scales and support the use of the BOS by paraprofessionals to assess behaviors associated with psychosis and mania.

show abstract

“…Reliability studies found the Depression Scale to have an inter-rater reliability of .82, with a Cronbach's a of .88. Validity studies comparing the BOS with the BPRS-E (Mogge, LePage, DelBen, and Murphy, 2002;Mogge, LePage, and Murphy, 1999) found the Depression Scale obtained the highest correlation with the BPRS-E's Agitated Depression Scale. Construct validity of the Depression Scale also was supported through a principle component analysis where the BOS Depression Scale and BPRS-E scales of Agitated Depression and Anhedonia loaded on the same factor.…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

“…The scoring produces the following range of scores: Psychosis 0-28, Mania 0-32, Depression 0-28, and Behavioral Dyscontrol 0-48. Initial studies found inter-rater reliabilities above .82 for each scale and Cronbach's a were all above .85 [LePage and Mogge, 2002].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Line staff use of the behavioral observation system: Assessment of depression scale validity and cut scores

LePage

Mogge²,

Sellers³

et al. 2003

Depress. Anxiety

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Behavioral Observation System (BOS) is an objective behavioral tool used by non-degreed line staff to assess depression, mania, psychosis, and acting out in psychiatric inpatients. The current study uses the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)-1A to provide evidence for convergent validity for the BOS Depression Scale and to determine effective cut-scores to assist in BOS interpretation. Findings support substantial correlational agreement between the BOS Depression Scale and the BDI. A discriminant function analysis established a "hit rate" of 82% using a Depression Scale score of 7 or greater to identify those with at least moderate levels of depression. The study data lend further credibility to the use of non-degreed line staff as a source of data that can aid in treatment decisions.

show abstract

The comparison of the Behavioral Observation System and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale—Expanded

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES).

The development of the Short Defeat and Entrapment Scale (SDES).

A comparison of the behavioral observation system (BOS) with clinician ratings of psychosis and mania

Line staff use of the behavioral observation system: Assessment of depression scale validity and cut scores

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About