2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison of magnetic circuits used in magnetic hyperthermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dT/dt versus H dependencies were subsequently fitted by a ( H/a) n function [ 51 ], where a and n are fitting parameters. If the sample includes only superparamagnetic nanoparticles (as proven by the magnetisation measurements), dT/dt = (H/a) n is a square function and n ≅ 2 [ 52 ]. Figure 6 A shows the dependence of dT/dt on the magnetic field amplitude H for the DEX x -MFs and the function of the fit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dT/dt versus H dependencies were subsequently fitted by a ( H/a) n function [ 51 ], where a and n are fitting parameters. If the sample includes only superparamagnetic nanoparticles (as proven by the magnetisation measurements), dT/dt = (H/a) n is a square function and n ≅ 2 [ 52 ]. Figure 6 A shows the dependence of dT/dt on the magnetic field amplitude H for the DEX x -MFs and the function of the fit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of the SAR evolution on the MW is presented in Figure 6 B. The SAR was estimated according to the following equation [ 52 ]: where C p is the specific heat capacity ( C p ≈ C water = 4.18 J∙K −1 ∙g −1 ), ρ S is the density of the sample (≈1021 kg∙m −3 ), m is the mass of magnetite per unit volume of the colloid (25 mg∙mL −1 ) and dT/dt is the heating rate (slope) calculated from the linear fit of the heating curves. In the case of smaller MWs (DEX 40 -MF and DEX 70 -MF), the SAR values are very low, but in the case of the DEX 150 -MF, the increase is obvious.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Iron content was determined using a Perkin Elmer 3110 atomic absorption spectrometer (AAS; Waltham, MA, USA), content of C was measured on a FlashSmart TM elemental analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA), and thermogravimetric analysis was performed in air flow with 10 • C/min heating rate on a Perkin Elmer TGA 7 thermogravimetric analyzer (Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with Pyris software. The heat effect of the mag.SLPs was tested under an alternating magnetic field (AMF) by homemade AC system and temperature changes were monitored by a fiber optic temperature sensor (FISO Technologies; Québec, Canada) (Skumiel et al, 2016). Magnetization of dry particles was determined using an EV9 vibrating sample magnetometer (DSM Magnetics, ADE Corp.; Lowell, MA, USA) at RT.…”
Section: Particle Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AMFG using single-layer and double-layer solenoid, Helmholtz coils, and inductor with C-shaped ferromagnetic core are the most common systems, which have been compared in [17]. The most common type is single-layer solenoid [18][19][20][21][22][23][24] on which this study is focused.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%