1951
DOI: 10.1037/h0054015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The comparison of a series of proportions: the problem and a new solution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1954
1954

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For purposes of graphic presentation, the mean percentage of "stronger" judgments of each scale step was plotted against the mean power delivered and 5Although the Spearman Summation Method does not weight errors, it does afford a rather accurate means of converting "stronger" judgments into power when the scale steps are not entirely equivalent. When scale steps are equal the method advocated by Davis (13) would seem more appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For purposes of graphic presentation, the mean percentage of "stronger" judgments of each scale step was plotted against the mean power delivered and 5Although the Spearman Summation Method does not weight errors, it does afford a rather accurate means of converting "stronger" judgments into power when the scale steps are not entirely equivalent. When scale steps are equal the method advocated by Davis (13) would seem more appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Davis (29) indicated that traditional methods of calculating psychophysical parameters from percentage data left much to be desired since their sampling errors were not known. He suggested that if the regression of transformed proportions on the stimulus scale were calculated, the appropriate standard error would be the standard error of estimate.…”
Section: Methods and Formulasmentioning
confidence: 99%